> Looks great thanks! Do the Jenkins jobs for 3.1.x need to be updated to use
> the new profile?
The profile is automatically activated on Jenkins by checking the BUILD_NUMBER
environment variable that Jenkins always sets.
Cheers
Dennis
Hi Roberto,
I think it is a good idea. The main drawback is that the 3.1.X stream
requires compatibility with Java 7. The MicroProfile spec and Rest Client
specifically sets Java 8 as the minimum Java level - and the Rest Client
specifically makes use of Java 8 syntax and APIs, like lambdas and
Looks great thanks! Do the Jenkins jobs for 3.1.x need to be updated to use
the new profile?
Colm.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 4:34 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote:
> On 28/02/2018 10:18, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
> >> Hi Dennis,
> >>
> >> Yes adding it into a profile would be great
On 28/02/2018 10:18, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> Yes adding it into a profile would be great - otherwise it wouldn't be
>> possible to build the branch without making local changes.
Done, please let me know if it still doesn't work for you.
Cheers
Dennis
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be ok to backport the Microprofile Client module
from the master branch in the 3.1.x branch.
This is because the latest spec of Microprofile, version 1.3, targets JAX-RS
2.0 and requires the Rest Client 1.0, implemented in 3.2.x, which is JAX-RS 2.1.
If this is
Fine with me, it's been a while since 3.1.14.
Colm.
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 28/02/2018 10:18, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
>
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>> Yes adding it into a profile would be great - otherwise it wouldn't be
>> possible to
On 28/02/2018 10:18, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Yes adding it into a profile would be great - otherwise it wouldn't be
possible to build the branch without making local changes.
+1
especially if we start thinking to release 3.1.15 anytime soon.. WDYT?
Regards.
On Tue, Feb 27,
Hi Dennis,
Yes adding it into a profile would be great - otherwise it wouldn't be
possible to build the branch without making local changes.
Colm.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote:
> Hi Colm,
>
> as written in the other thread a toolchains.xml like