Re: CXF 3.1 and Java 11

2019-01-23 Thread Freeman Fang
Hi Gary, No, there would be lots of other things won’t run with JDK11 on CXF 3.1.x. We support JDK11 for upcoming CXF 3.3. - Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. > On Jan 24, 2019, at 6:02 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is there any hope in trying to get CXF 3.1.17 runn

CXF 3.1 and Java 11

2019-01-23 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All, Is there any hope in trying to get CXF 3.1.17 running on top of Java 11? We've found that the absence of JAX-WS to be an insurmountable obstacle. Gary

[GitHub] dkulp merged pull request #505: Get rid of IndexArrayOutOfBounds

2019-01-23 Thread GitBox
dkulp merged pull request #505: Get rid of IndexArrayOutOfBounds URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/505 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use th

[GitHub] Breeki32 opened a new pull request #505: Get rid of IndexArrayOutOfBounds

2019-01-23 Thread GitBox
Breeki32 opened a new pull request #505: Get rid of IndexArrayOutOfBounds URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/505 If an environment defines the java.version with 1.8.0 this code will die with an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsEx. To evade this either the length of the version should be ch

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

2019-01-23 Thread Andy McCright
Thanks for the reminder Dennis - I just resolved it. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:40 AM Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > > > I was able to get the MP Rest Client 1.2 APIs and TCKs final release done > > on time, so 3.3.0 will support the final release instead of a release > > candidate! > > Great Andy,

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

2019-01-23 Thread Dennis Kieselhorst
> I was able to get the MP Rest Client 1.2 APIs and TCKs final release done > on time, so 3.3.0 will support the final release instead of a release > candidate! Great Andy, can we resolve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7926? Cheers Dennis

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

2019-01-23 Thread Andy McCright
+1 I was able to get the MP Rest Client 1.2 APIs and TCKs final release done on time, so 3.3.0 will support the final release instead of a release candidate! Thanks, Andy On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 9:07 AM jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 21/01/2019 14:06, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > > Hi, > > > >

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

2019-01-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 21/01/2019 14:06, Dennis Kieselhorst wrote: > Hi, > > in my view everything we discussed is finished. So we can cut a release and > start a vote, can't we? > > Cheers > Dennis > +1 not binding :D -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

2019-01-23 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

2019-01-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Regards JB On 23/01/2019 15:06, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > +1, I think we are good to go. > > Colm. > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:05 AM Andrey Redko wrote: > >> +1 as well, long due. I am working on examples for Java 11 and JPMS, but it >> is not blocking anyhow the vote / release. Thank

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

2019-01-23 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1, I think we are good to go. Colm. On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:05 AM Andrey Redko wrote: > +1 as well, long due. I am working on examples for Java 11 and JPMS, but it > is not blocking anyhow the vote / release. Thanks guys. > > Best Regards, > Andriy Redko > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 8:53 PM

Re: microprofile openapi @asf?

2019-01-23 Thread Dennis Kieselhorst
Hi, as written in the JIRA comment https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7601?focusedCommentId=1675&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-1675 there is now a branch for the implementation with a working draft. Cheers Dennis