Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

2019-08-09 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Come on, lets get it out :-) +1 Sergey On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:46 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > +1. > > Colm. > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:42 AM Alessio Soldano > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Thanks > > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:10 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > > This is vote to release C

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

2019-08-09 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:42 AM Alessio Soldano wrote: > +1 > > Thanks > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:10 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > This is vote to release CXF 3.2.10 and CXF 3.3.3. 3.3.3 also required > > the release of cxf-build-utils 3.4.3 to pickup the new Checkstyle and PMD > >

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

2019-08-09 Thread Alessio Soldano
+1 Thanks On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 7:10 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is vote to release CXF 3.2.10 and CXF 3.3.3. 3.3.3 also required > the release of cxf-build-utils 3.4.3 to pickup the new Checkstyle and PMD > configs required by the new maven plugins. This fixes over 30 JIRA issues > report

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

2019-08-09 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 08/08/19 19:10, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is vote to release CXF 3.2.10 and CXF 3.3.3. 3.3.3 also required the release of cxf-build-utils 3.4.3 to pickup the new Checkstyle and PMD configs required by the new maven plugins. This fixes over 30 JIRA issues reported by users. Staging areas:

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

2019-08-09 Thread Jim Ma
+1 On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 3:08 PM Alexey Markevich wrote: > +1 > > On 8/8/19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Le jeu. 8 août 2019 à 20:57, Dennis Kieselhorst a > écrit : > > > >> +1 > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> > > >

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

2019-08-09 Thread Alexey Markevich
+1 On 8/8/19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Le jeu. 8 août 2019 à 20:57, Dennis Kieselhorst a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Thanks! >> >> >