Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

2019-10-24 Thread Jim Ma
+1 On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:29 AM Jeff Genender wrote: > +1 > > Jeff > > > On Oct 24, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since > that’s also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. > > > > It’s been over 2

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

2019-10-24 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff > On Oct 24, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since that’s > also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. > > It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed 20 JIRAS. > > Staging area: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

2019-10-24 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 24/10/2019 17:34, Daniel Kulp wrote: Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since that’s also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed 20 JIRAS. Staging area:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

2019-10-24 Thread 方越
+1 (binding) Thanks! Freeman > On Oct 24, 2019, at 11:34 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since that’s > also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. > > It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed 20

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

2019-10-24 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 (non binding) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

2019-10-24 Thread Andrey Redko
+1, thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko On Thu, Oct 24, 2019, 11:34 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since that’s > also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. > > It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

2019-10-24 Thread Andy McCright
+1 Thanks! On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:34 AM Daniel Kulp wrote: > Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since that’s > also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. > > It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed 20 JIRAS. > > Staging area: >

[VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

2019-10-24 Thread Daniel Kulp
Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since that’s also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed 20 JIRAS. Staging area: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1146 Tag:

Re: WSDLManager.removeDefinition method is not always working

2019-10-24 Thread arkadyz
Hi, Dennis Can you please provide link to the bug ? I would like to know which jars/classes were fixed exactly. Thanks, Arkady -- Sent from: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/cxf-dev-f569328.html

Re: WSDLManager.removeDefinition method is not always working

2019-10-24 Thread Dennis Kieselhorst
Hi! > I put attention the method "removeDefinition" of WSDLManager doesn't always > actually remove definition. > > Bus bus = BusFactory.getDefaultBus(); > WSDLManager wsdlManager = bus.getExtension(WSDLManager.class); > Definition def = wsdlManager.getDefinition(wsdlLocation); >

WSDLManager.removeDefinition method is not always working

2019-10-24 Thread arkadyz
Hi, I am using Wildfly 11 with cxf-core-3.1.12 I put attention the method "removeDefinition" of WSDLManager doesn't always actually remove definition. Bus bus = BusFactory.getDefaultBus(); WSDLManager wsdlManager = bus.getExtension(WSDLManager.class); Definition def =