> On Jan 28, 2020, at 8:02 PM, Chris Lambertus wrote:
>
>
> Allen, can you elaborate on what a “proper” implementation is? As far as I
> know, this is baked into jenkins. We could raise process limits for the
> jenkins user, but these situations only tend to arise when a build has gone
>
> On Jan 27, 2020, at 10:52 PM, Allen Wittenauer
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jan 27, 2020, at 6:37 PM, Andriy Redko wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot for looking into it. From the CXF perspective, I have seen that
>> many CXF builds have been aborted
>> because of the connection with master is lost (do
> On Dec 11, 2019, at 2:53 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On Dec 9, 2019, at 4:56 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 8, 2019, at 9:17 PM, Jim Ma wrote:
>>> If both JAXB and JAX-WS changes, should cxf community join the effort to
>>> contribute and drive the jax-ws spec thing ?
>>
>> Well, th
amarkevich merged pull request #634: [CXF-8203] Update to cglib 3.3.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/634
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
jbonofre commented on a change in pull request #633: [CXF-8202] Update to OSGi
Core 6.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/633#discussion_r371837868
##
File path: parent/pom.xml
##
@@ -247,7 +247,8 @@
20100527_1
2.0.8_6
[1.4,2)
-5.
jbonofre commented on a change in pull request #633: [CXF-8202] Update to OSGi
Core 6.0.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/633#discussion_r371838143
##
File path: parent/pom.xml
##
@@ -1320,7 +1321,7 @@
org.osgi
org.os
