Re: [RELEASE REQUEST] Next 3.x release?

Hi Romain, I think it is feasible to have a release in a few weeks (if there are no objections from the guys), from my side I have to wrap up one MTOM regression and one more issue related to MTOM content injection. Thanks. Best Regards, Andriy Redko RMB> Hi all, RMB> Is it possible to

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

For OSGI and Karaf Jakarta native, I remembered I talked with Freeman about this topic several months ago and got to know there won't be Jakarta namespace support work in the future. I don't know if this has changed. Freeman, do you have some update on this ? On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 6:43 AM

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on pull request #992: Cxf 8710

reta commented on PR #992: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/992#issuecomment-1223279038 Thanks a lot, @awrb ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

Hey Jim, I think these [1], [2], [3] (Swagger 1.x, OSGi and Karaf) are real blockers. For Swagger 1.x, we could go ahead and drop the support altogether, this is quite isolated feature. OSGi and Karaf are not, those penetrated very deep into core. What worries me, if we drop everything

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #990: specs says type in header should at+jwt

reta commented on code in PR #990: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/990#discussion_r951956470 ## rt/rs/security/oauth-parent/oauth2/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/rs/security/oauth2/provider/AbstractOAuthDataProvider.java: ## @@ -646,7 +647,12 @@ protected String

[GitHub] [cxf] reta commented on a diff in pull request #990: specs says type in header should at+jwt

reta commented on code in PR #990: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/990#discussion_r951956470 ## rt/rs/security/oauth-parent/oauth2/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/rs/security/oauth2/provider/AbstractOAuthDataProvider.java: ## @@ -646,7 +647,12 @@ protected String

[GitHub] [cxf] awrb commented on pull request #992: Cxf 8710

awrb commented on PR #992: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/992#issuecomment-1222759090 Hi @reta, I updated the pull request after the code review. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

JDK 19 first Release Candidates!

Greetings! I hope you had a chance to take some time off. On our side, and despite the summer vacation, everything is on track for the Java 19 GA release on September 20th with JDK 19 now in the Release Candidate Phase [1]. If you haven't done so yet, it is time to start testing your

[GitHub] [cxf] reta merged pull request #991: use getter in case of overwritten from child class

reta merged PR #991: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/991 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apache.org For

[RELEASE REQUEST] Next 3.x release?

Hi all, Is it possible to get a 3.5.4 or 3.6 out to be able to get back https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8732 please ? Thanks, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog |

[GitHub] [cxf] arthurchan35 commented on pull request #989: Make opaque access token generation extensible

arthurchan35 commented on PR #989: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/989#issuecomment-1221875531 In case of you wonder why is it necessary: In our code, after CXF generates the opaque token, we have some additional customization code to apply to the cxf generated token.