Hi Andriy,
Can we start the release work if there isn't the major thing left we need
to include in CXF 4.0.0 release ?
@Daniel Kulp Can you please help do the release when
it's convenient for you?
Thanks,
Jim
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> +1 to release
reta commented on PR #1028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1028#issuecomment-1328330312
> As I told you, you may do anything that is needed with my contribution —
would it be a force push, or close the PR, I'd be happy as long as we fix it
Pushed the change, could you please
neseleznev commented on PR #1028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1028#issuecomment-1328326469
> > Sure thing @reta. I'm glad you found out more stable solution. I keep an
eye on new version with the fix deployed, thank you
>
> I have opened a regression ticket
reta commented on PR #1028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1028#issuecomment-1328318747
> Sure thing @reta. I'm glad you found out more stable solution. I keep an
eye on new version with the fix deployed, thank you
I have opened a regression ticket
neseleznev commented on PR #1028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1028#issuecomment-1328318339
Sure thing @reta. I'm glad you found out more stable solution. I keep an eye
on new version with the fix deployed, thank you
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
reta commented on PR #1028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1028#issuecomment-1328317923
> Sadly, this method is `public static`, thus should be considered as public
API of the library. As a consequence, it could be used in third-party
libraries, which rely on the current behavior,
neseleznev commented on PR #1028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/1028#issuecomment-1328308378
@reta
Personally, I'd better fix the reason rather than symptoms. As of now,
`createContentID` creates ContentID (), which is malformed by RFC definition.
Sadly, this method is
