Re: [VOTE] - Andriy Redko as CXF PMC Chair

Am 02.08.2024 um 16:54 schrieb Colm O hEigeartaigh: As Dan has confirmed he is stepping down, this is a vote to ask Andriy Redko to become the next CXF PMC Chair. +1

Re: Deprecate aegis databinding ?

might be still using it, I checked https://repository.apache.org/#central-stat for org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-databinding-aegis: Last month 4.0.0 17944 downloads (29% of total) and 3.3.10 8513 downloads (14%). For comparison cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb 3.5.5 79295 (9%) and 4.0.3 60053 (7%). Best, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

+1

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.9 and 3.5.4

+1 Greetings from ApacheCon New Orleans :-) Dennis

Re: Please update 4.0-SNAPSHOT

Hi Andriy, I think you are close, the errors are just Javadoc-related for Swagger and Jetty 9. Great work so far, really unfortunate that I didn't found the time to contribute... Best, Dennis

Re: Please update 4.0-SNAPSHOT

Hi Vladimir, the reason for that is that the build is failing since then: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17-deploy/ Will take a look... Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.5.3 and 3.4.8

+1 Thanks!

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.5.2 and 3.4.7

+1 Thanks!

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

and security updates. Best, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.4.2/3.3.9

+1 Thanks!

Re: Jakarta target

n't seen a single user asking for it), but I would definitely revisit this discussion in mid-2021. Best, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.1 and 3.3.8

+1 Thanks!

Re: CVE-2019-12419

Hi Colm, in my case the issue was different (incorrect version range). Therefore I have no example that excludes XJC. Best, Dennis

Re: CVE-2019-12419

working proposal already? Best Dennis

Re: codegen failing on 3.4.0

Hi David, I'm unable to reproduce it. This interface is part of cxf-core which is listed in your output as well. Maybe a corrupted Maven download? Have you tried it with a clean repo? Best, Dennis Am 25.08.2020 um 09:55 schrieb David Karlsen: > I'm seeing: > > [INFO] Sc

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.0

+1 Thanks!

Re: Release CXF 3.4.0

Apologies, maybe it was just too late yesterday evening. I was also seeing the CORBA errors, probably I partially used old versions. Just did a fresh clean build with Andriy's fixes and everything was succesful. Best, Dennis

Re: Release CXF 3.4.0

brave.internal.propagation.CorrelationFieldScopeDecorator [ERROR] class file for brave.internal.propagation.CorrelationFieldScopeDecorator not found Best, Dennis

Re: Migration to new ci-builds.a.o

18847 only Daniel and Colm have permission at the moment. Best, Dennis

Re: Release CXF 3.4.0

well. Best, Dennis

Re: Migration to new ci-builds.a.o

Hi, first successful build using matrix: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/pipeline/job/master/65/ We can now start simplifying existing stages, adding additional stages for deploy and sonar and adding additional JDKs to the matrix. Best, Dennis

Re: Release CXF 3.4.0

Hi, we are ready for a release now, aren't we? Best, Dennis

Re: Migration to new ci-builds.a.o

causing the build queue to be ~3500 long. This makes it really hard to experiment and try out things. See also https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7fe2b9ace77b5658240542e13630b415ac9b76a81c486580910ed062%40%3Cbuilds.apache.org%3E Best, Dennis

Re: Migration to new ci-builds.a.o

Hi Andriy, will do. Just started with the adapted pipeline from struts and wanted to simplify that using the declarative matrix feature. Unfortunately build queue length in Jenkins is >1000 at the moment which makes testing impossible. Will continue it later this weekend. Best, Dennis

Re: Migration to new ci-builds.a.o

In the meantime I had another thought, see here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0a86bc4ac23d3984701d75ddb75dda858cd08d2f7aa56c0e3ef86e75%40%3Cbuilds.apache.org%3E So in the end we would just having one job to cover the standard things. Best, Dennis Am 22.07.2020 um 14:26 schrieb Andrey

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: [CXF-8281]add a test for using Chinese as attachment file name

pTest/testMtomWithChineseFileName/ Maybe moving to a different folder (that is also used by other tests) helps? Best, Dennis On 2020/07/09 11:48:39, ff...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > ffang pushed a commit to branch master &

Re: Release CXF 3.4.0

Hi, just tried Spring Boot 2.3.x locally, works well. Any reasons why I should not commit the change for 3.4.0? See also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8301 Best, Dennis

Re: Migration to new ci-builds.a.o

Hi Andriy! > Thanks a lot, Dennis! The first job CXF-Trunk-JDK18 is migrated: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK18 > Could you please check if you have enough permissions to create new jobs, > change job configurations, etc. > Thanks! > Permissions

Re: Migration to new ci-builds.a.o

Happy to help, Andriy! Best, Dennis Am 21.07.2020 um 04:43 schrieb Andriy Redko: > Hey guys, > > The news stroke me by surprise but according to the mailing list thread [1], > we have > to migrate all our Jenkins jobs to the new ci-builds.a.o server(s). I have > creat

Re: Release CXF 3.4.0

Hi, what about SAAJ 1.5? https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/672 Best, Dennis On 14.07.2020 18:38, Andriy Redko wrote: Hi Colm, +1, with 3.4.x out we are going to stop supporting 3.2.x release, correct? Thanks! Best Regards, Andriy Redko COh> Hi all, COh> We currently have n

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.7 and 3.2.14

+1 Thanks Dennis

Re: Releases soon?

+1 Thanks Dennis Am 12.06.2020 um 23:23 schrieb Andy McCright: > +1 from me. Thanks Colm! > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:36 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre > wrote: > >> It sounds good. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >>> Le 11 juin 2020 à 13:12, Colm O

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.6 and 3.2.13

+1 Thanks!

Fwd: Build failed when maven-toolchains-plugin used

est15" Could you please revert that? https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deployment/modules/build_slaves/files/toolchains.xml doesn't show any change related to that. Thanks Dennis Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Build failed when maven-toolcha

Re: Jakarta EE TCKs and compatibility logo

marked as error (red)? Best, Dennis

Re: [cxf-fediz] 01/02: Update Jetty

in: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7949 Best, Dennis

Re: [cxf-fediz] 01/02: Update Jetty

Hi! I think I'd prefer to keep the Jetty version in Fediz aligned with the version of Jetty in the CXF release. For CXF we need to debug JAXRSRequestDispatcherTest.testGetBookHTMLInclude (an update breaks it). Haven't found the time yet. Best, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.3.5 and 3.2.12

+1 Thanks!

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

OSGi mess that I'm unable to solve. I've just asked on the SM list for a release of SAAJ 1.4 spec bundle. Hopefully this will be the missing piece in the puzzle (as discussed in CXF-7910)... Best, Dennis On 2019/01/11 00:34:52, Freeman Fang wrote: > I will also take a look at the

Re: SonarCloud config

). Best, Dennis

SonarCloud config

/job/CXF-Master-Analysis/ ? Cheers Dennis

Re: WSDLManager.removeDefinition method is not always working

Hi Arkady! > I tested on version 3.3.3 and still has problems. > Can you provide us with a testcase that reproduces the issue? Cheers Dennis

Re: WSDLManager.removeDefinition method is not always working

and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7824. Best, Dennis

Re: WSDLManager.removeDefinition method is not always working

try 3.1.18 or even better 3.3.3 which is the latest release? Best, Dennis

Re: Flip master to 3.4, create 3.3.x-fixes

ally running the > now-open-sourced TCK), and then use 3.5.X or later to support Jakarta EE 9 > with the new package names and new functionality? > Your proposal makes sense to me. Maybe it's even time for CXF 4.x.x then... Cheers Dennis

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.10, CXF 3.3.3, and buildutils 3.4.3

+1 Thanks!

Re: Releases

Hi Colm, please go ahead. Thanks Dennis Am 6. August 2019 16:03:29 MESZ schrieb Colm O hEigeartaigh : >Hi all, > >Are there any other issues that should be fixed for CXF 3.3.3 / 3.2.10, >or >are we good to go for the releases? > >Colm. > > >-- >Colm O hEige

Re: Time to think about 3.4.0?

Hi Andriy, sure, please go ahead with the change. Unfortunately I don't have much time at the moment :-( Cheers Dennis Am 14. Juli 2019 20:19:00 MESZ schrieb Andriy Redko : >Hey Dennis, > >Sorry, I have never gotten the reply from you, not sure why :( Anyway, >do you mind &g

Re: Time to think about 3.4.0?

Hi Andriy, yeah, I remember it. I answered you at that time that the change is fine for me. I was also a bit undecided when initially creating the package name. Cheers Dennis Am 14.07.2019 um 19:52 schrieb Andriy Redko: > Hey Dennis, > > Sounds great, I have created a JIRA [1] to t

Re: Time to think about 3.4.0?

d new features not in a bugfix releases. Cheers Dennis Am 14.07.2019 um 17:57 schrieb Andriy Redko: > Hey guys, > > There are quite a lot of things going on with Jakarta EE, we already have the > first > JAX-RS 2.2 snapshots available [1], I am sure more specs will follow

Re: Bypass archiving on PR?

Good proposal, I think default is on and deactivation is hidden in the advanced section, so that is why it was probably never changed. I've just changed the config... Cheers Dennis

Re: Dropping JDK9 / JDK10 jobs from Jenkins

Hi Andriy! I think we could drop CXF's JDK9 [0] and JDK10 [1] jobs from Jenkins since these JDKs are officially dead. Any objections? No objections, I also thought about this to reduce the number of build jobs. Best, Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.9, CXF 3.3.2, and cxf-build-utils 3.4.2

+1 Thanks!

Re: Test failure

point in sending out failures. I see you already turned them off. The job was pointing to an old Git repo, I have changed it to Gitbox. Now 33 test failures: https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/CXF/job/CXF-trunk-windows/299/testReport/ Dennis

Re: Test failure

I can do it on the weekend. We also have a disabled Jenkins job für Windows. Shall I enable it? Dennis Am 21. März 2019 18:12:21 MEZ schrieb Daniel Kulp : > >In this specific case, I wonder if putting a .gitattributes file that >specifies that *.data files are binary would work.

Re: Test failure

The test is failing on Windows. I also had this when I once tried to build it there. It's not the only one so better use Ubuntu or Mac. Dennis Am 21. März 2019 17:48:07 MEZ schrieb Daniel Kulp : >I’m not seeing this on my machine.Right now I’m using >1.8.0_181-b13, but I’ll up

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.1

+1 Thanks! Am 28. Februar 2019 19:56:36 MEZ schrieb Daniel Kulp : >This is vote to release 3.3.1. This doesn’t fix a ton of issues (only >12), but it does fix two relatively important regressions. > >Staging area: >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1136/ >

Re: 3.3.1 tomorrow?

Definitely +1 Thanks! Am 27. Februar 2019 15:54:58 MEZ schrieb Daniel Kulp : > >I’d like to get 3.3.1 out real soon as it does fix a fairly severe >performance issue and I’d like to get a “.1” out to appease folks that >refuse to touch a .0. :) > >Anyone have any objections if I do the build tom

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.1.18

+1 I suggest to announce this as the last 3.1.x release (except for security fixes). Regards Dennis

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.0 and CXF XJC Utils 3.3.0

+1 although a fresh build is still not working on JDK9+ due to the Corba stuff. We should fix that for 3.3.1. Cheers Dennis

Corba and JDK9+

Hi, I just noticed that JDK9+ builds fail as those builds depend on a previously deployed cxf-rt-bindings-corba from the JDK8 build, e.g.: https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/CXF/job/CXF-Master-JDK11/267/console Regards Dennis

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.8

+1 Thanks!

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

> I was able to get the MP Rest Client 1.2 APIs and TCKs final release done > on time, so 3.3.0 will support the final release instead of a release > candidate! Great Andy, can we resolve https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7926? Cheers Dennis

Re: microprofile openapi @asf?

Hi, as written in the JIRA comment https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7601?focusedCommentId=1675&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-1675 there is now a branch for the implementation with a working draft. Cheers Dennis

Re: Jakarta EE TCKs and compatibility logo

Hi, I think we should definitely setup jobs to ensure the TCKs pass but do we really need the logo?! What do you think? Cheers Dennis On 2019/01/21 10:46:37, Mark Thomas wrote: > Apologies for the noise. > > The correct link for [3] is: > > https://jakarta.ee/legal/trade

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

Hi, in my view everything we discussed is finished. So we can cut a release and start a vote, can't we? Cheers Dennis

Re: Fwd: Build failed in Jenkins: CXF-trunk-deploy » Apache CXF Manifest Jar #3341

Hi Colm, Freeman already updated cxf-xjc-utils. We can set the version to SNAPSHOT, that should fix it. Cheers Dennis Am 15.01.2019 um 20:18 schrieb Colm O hEigeartaigh: > > Hi Dennis, > > Could you look at this error if you get a chance? > > Colm. > >

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

r stick to CXF 3.2.x. Regards Dennis

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

and avoid >> another delay. >> > Yep let's tentatively target a vote at the end of next week? +1 Cheers Dennis

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

and JAX-RS (along with JAXB) for 3.3.0 as those are the main implementations that we are offering. Everything else can be done for 3.4.0. I also agree that we should release soon (maybe next week?) and avoid another delay. Regards Dennis

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

> you know when they plan to release 4.0.2? > Just discussed on the list with Mark Thomas: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/servlet-dev/msg00069.html So probably this will take some more days... Regards Dennis

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

e absolutely right. I've started to configure bannedDependencies in maven-enforcer-plugin config. This way we can ensure that the right exclusions are in place. Regards Dennis

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

Hi, the JAXB, JAX-WS, SAAJ and some more API dependencies are now available on central. Servlet-API is still missing, but I noticed that we are currently using 3.1.0 anyway. Do we plan to update to 4.0.2? Regards Dennis

Re: GraphQL Project?

y plan is to depend on geronimo-openapi (based on your Maven plugin approach). I already started experimenting with that and will share a prototype for discussion soon. Cheers Dennis

Re: GraphQL Project?

Great idea. I think it would be great for CXF to have both OpenAPI and GraphQL support. Cheers Dennis

Re: cxf-services-ws-discovery-api

ring the Jenkins build: https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/CXF/job/CXF-Trunk-JDK18/org.apache.cxf.services.ws-discovery$cxf-services-ws-discovery-api/4095/testReport/org.apache.cxf.ws.discovery/WSDiscoveryClientTest/testMultiResponses/ Regards Dennis

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

Haven't found an updated schedule yet. I asked on the mailinglist but so far I got no response :-( Regards Dennis

Re: CxfTypeSafeClientBuilderTest failing on JDK9+

://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/CXF/job/CXF-Master-JDK12/lastCompletedBuild/org.apache.cxf$cxf-rt-rs-mp-client/testReport/org.apache.cxf.microprofile.client/CxfTypeSafeClientBuilderTest/testCanInvokeDefaultInterfaceMethods/ Regards Dennis

CxfTypeSafeClientBuilderTest failing on JDK9+

org.apache.cxf.microprofile.client.CxfTypeSafeClientBuilderTest.testCanInvokeDefaultInterfaceMethods(CxfTypeSafeClientBuilderTest.java:173) Anyone seen something similar before? Cheers Dennis

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

Hi, I think we should definitely integrate the JakartaEE dependencies (groupId/ artifactId change as announced earlier). According to schedule they will be release next Friday (14.12.2018). Regards Dennis

Re: CXF 3.1.18 release

> OK fair enough. I propose that this might be the last release of 3.1.x > though. +1

Re: New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

Hi, please note that not all dependencies are available on central yet but only in a staging repo. JAXB and JAX-WS dependencies are planned to be release in December. This page provides an overview: https://wiki.eclipse.org/Eclipse_GlassFish_5.1_Components_Release_Tracker Regards Dennis

Re: Remove HTrace tracing?

+1 We should only maintain active integrations. Cheers Dennis

New Maven coordinates for Jakarta EE specs

Hi, please note that there are new Maven coordinates for the Jakarta EE specs: https://wiki.eclipse.org/New_Maven_Coordinates In my view we should change the dependencies for our 3.3.0 release. I already did it for JAX-RS. Cheers Dennis

Re: microprofile openapi @asf?

soon). We would need to implement a replacement for GeronimoOpenAPIExtension, right? Regards Dennis

Re: Looking for the 3.2.7 version of cxf-rt-rs-extension-reactivestreams and cxf-rt-rs-extension-rx2

and http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/cxf/cxf-rt-rs-extension-reactivestreams/3.2.7/ Regards Dennis

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

api-2.3 has not been > released yet so we cannot refer to it > Ok just noticed that cxf.jaxb.bundle.version was updated to 2.3.0 and thought it's all done. Thanks for the explanation. Cheers Dennis

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.7 and xic-utils 3.2.3

+1 Thanks!

Re: Jenkins Builds

> Does anyone know what is causing this error? I've seen that too some days ago, but was too lazy to report it to INFRA. I just wiped the workspace, afterwards it was working. Cheers Dennis

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF 3.1.17

+1 (binding) Thanks!

Re: Adding resourcePackages in OpenAPICustomizer

Hi Irfan, just tried your usecase by adding resourcePackages to our sample https://github.com/apache/cxf/tree/master/distribution/src/main/release/samples/jax_rs/spring_boot and it worked. Maybe you can attach a project to reproduce it to the issue that you will create. Cheers Dennis

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: update some dependencies

I decided to revert ActiveMQ to the old version. >=5.15.0 causes the test failure. It also fails with Karaf 4.2.0. Everything looks correct so I don't know why. Maybe Christian can take a look... Regards Dennis

Re: [cxf] branch master updated: update some dependencies

Ops, sorry had multiple other unrelated test failures that's why I haven't recognized it. Will fix it until Sunday. Cheers Dennis Am 17. August 2018 17:32:26 MESZ schrieb Andriy Redko : >Same effect for OpenAPI test cases, they started to fail now > >Best Regards, >

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

Hi Freeman! > FYI, I’ve already start doing it on Servicemix side, please see Great to hear that. Any planned release date? Cheers Dennis

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.6

+1 Thanks!

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

On 2018/07/27 11:28:33, Andriy Redko wrote: > 2.2.11 > > Let us try to upgrade to 2.3.0? :-) Looks like there is not yet an OSGi Servicemix Bundle for that version (this is referenced in cxf.jaxb.bundle.version). Regards Dennis

Re: swagger-jaxrs2 2.0.1 / JAXB 2.3.0

Now that we have 3.3.x in master we should be able to upgrade it. Has anyone already started with this? Cheers Dennis On 2018/04/19 09:28:29, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > Let's wait for Dan's opinion on this - maybe the upgrade is more suitable > for a new major release

Re: Change master to 3.3?

Definitely +1 > And how about for the master we also have spring 5 + spring boot 2, basically > merge the spring-5-boot-2 branch? Yes, I started the branch for testing and it looks good. Thank you for fixing some tests. Regards Dennis

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.5/3.1.16

+1 Thanks!

Re: microprofile openapi @asf?

7;s hosted. Regards Dennis Am 18.06.2018 um 21:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: > Hi guys, > > I'm planning to implement microprofile-openapi at geronimo (next to other > microprofile specs) soon (probably beginning of next month). Before doing > so I wanted to get in touch with yo

  1   2   3   4   >