Looking at org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.impl.NewCookieHeaderProvider.toString() it
seems CXF does not have check about the cookie version. So if we have
special character which is only allowed in version 1 cookie, there will be
an issue.
+1 for this change.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context
consuming operation while supporting soapHandler?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/What-dataType-in-Dispatch-API-should-I-use-to-gain-best-performance-tp5759221p5759772.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
y bad. Do you know what dataType is suggested to gain best performance
when using the Dispatch API? Or is there any CXF internal dataType that can
be used to gain best performance?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/What-da
Hi Sergy,
How about using:
message.get(Message.BASE_PATH) + ":" + rawPath + ":" + httpMethod + ":" +
requestContentType + ":" + acceptTypes;
I have a proposed solution for this and will open a jira for this. Let's
discuss the implementation deta
subsequent
request.
Provider matching is under the same situation as well. We can provide a
cache for matched provider to save effort.
What do you think of this problem? Can we add such support in CXF?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.54721
Thanks Sergey, I confirmed in lastes CXF code, this has arleady been fixed.
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/MessageBodyReader-and-MessageBodyWritter-should-follow-different-sorting-rule-tp5757415p5757483.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.
380.
We can get this fixed to adjust the MessageBodyReader sorting rule. I have
opened an JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6412 and provide a
fix for this probllem. Can you help review it and give your comments?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context
Thanks Sergey for the reply. It is good news that these providers are put
into other modules just because better modularization. We can be more sure
to put them in :)
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/atom-support-in-CXF-tp5757256p5757260.html
Sent from the cx
& Best Regards,
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/atom-support-in-CXF-tp5757256.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ook at this problem?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6373
Thanks & Best Regards,
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CompletionCallback-can-not-get-the-Throwable-if-error-occurs-in-other-interceptor-no-serviceinvokerI-tp5756543.html
Sent from t
Thanks a lot Sergey for taking care of this issue!
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/NPE-when-calling-ServiceUnavailableException-getRetryTime-tp5756231p5756318.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
eHeaderProvider to handle Date type.
I do not think NPE here is correct. If so, does it mean we do not support
this API( ServiceUnavailableException.getRetryTime()) call at all?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.c
.
Can you please take a look at the problem? Thanks a lot!
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/NPE-when-calling-ServiceUnavailableException-getRetryTime-tp5756231.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Sergey for taking care of this issue.
In my test, I just use below two links:
http://localhost:9080//rest/resource/getlinks
html://localhost:8080/nohttp
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/ContainerResponseContext-getLinks-lose-links
below javadoc for Link:
getRel()
Returns the value associated with the link rel param, or null if this param
is not specified.
Can you please take a look at the problem? I have already created a jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6352 for it and attached a
proposed fix.
Thanks a lot!
Iris
kList.add(b1); bookList.add(b2); }
}
I have opened CXF-6001 for this issue and uploaded a proposed fix. Looking
forward to your comments!
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/CXF-fails-to-find-a-correct-MessageBodyWritter-for-List-E-if-Resource-method-is-defined-under-async-y-tp5748709.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Sergey, cxf-5943 is opened to track this and a patch is uploaded.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Throw-Error-in-ExceptionMapper-tp5747662p5747748.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is problem?
Thanks.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Throw-Error-in-ExceptionMapper-tp5747662.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sergey,
Thanks. I am willing to contribute I will start to work in the
ClassCastException soon.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/context-injection-through-setter-method-method-name-restriction-tp5746712p5747118.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing
Thanks a lot Sergey. Will fix #1 in cxf-5897.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/context-injection-through-setter-method-method-name-restriction-tp5746712p5746890.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I think we can make it follow below two rules:
1. If the parameterType is not an Interface, just ignore the method.
2. Scan available providers to make sure there is one provider who can deal
with the parametertype, otherwise, just ignore it as well.
any thoughts?
Iris Ding
--
View this
Sergey,
I mean if we want to support parameter type(custom context) in setter method
other than those specified in spec, we can not add check about parameter
type.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/context-injection-through-setter-method-method-name
OK, Then Sergey if we want to allow custom context we need support it via
another way..
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/context-injection-through-setter-method-method-name-restriction-tp5746712p5746802.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.c
it. any thoughts?
Have CXF already supported all above types now?
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/context-injection-through-setter-method-method-name-restriction-tp5746712p5746796.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Andrei and Sergey.
An issue is opened to track this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5897
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/context-injection-through-setter-method-method-name-restriction-tp5746712p5746781.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing lis
Info
HttpHeaders
Request
SecurityContext
What do you think about this problem?
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/context-injection-through-setter-method-method-name-restriction-tp5746712.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks Sergey. Let's keep an eye on what is going on for the JAXRS SPEC
clarification.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/two-issues-in-org-apache-cxf-jaxrs-provider-DataSourceProvider-tp5745783p5745974.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archi
Thanks Sergey for your fix for this issue.
But actually I have a question for the fix as it is against spec for support
of subclasses or concrete implementations for DataSource. I have put my
question in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5835 as well.
The other question is:
In ProviderFa
Thanks Daniel for digging out the issue.
So how about below change to convert the ClassCastException to a 415
response?
public T readFrom(Class cls, Type genericType, Annotation[]
annotations,
MediaType type,
MultivaluedMap heade
original incomming
InputStream, Users will loose control of it. He might need to use specific
API to operate the different stream.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/two-issues-in-org-apache-cxf-jaxrs-provider-DataSourceProvider-tp5745783p5745788.html
Sent
used. In such case, if we return
directly the original InputStream, users will loose control of the behaviour
the returned InputStream. what do you think about this point?
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/two-issues-in-org-apache-cxf-jaxrs-provider
Hi Guys,
I think There are two issues in
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.provider.DataSourceProvider:
Issue 1: ClassCastException if you post a FileDataSource in your resource
class:
Issue 2: Return the original InputStream directly in
InputStreamDataSource.getInputStream().
I have created a JIRA in
http
Hi Guys,
In setPayload(Source s) method of
org.apache.cxf.jaxws.handler.logical.LogicalMessageImpl.java,
we will set SOAPMessage directly in Inbound as below:
SOAPMessage m = message.getContent(SOAPMessage.class);
if (m != null && !MessageUtils.isOutbound(message)) {
try {
Thanks a lot, Daniel!
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/extensions-dynamically-added-removed-from-exited-bus-tp5730582p5732472.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e the bus, Is
this understanding right?
Many Thanks!
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/extensions-dynamically-added-removed-from-exited-bus-tp5730582p5731571.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
cxf jar, eg: the 5th cxf jar.
In this scenario, we need to remove the extensions defined in the 5yh cxf
jar from the existed bus.
But I can not find a suitable way to do this.
Can somebody please shed some lights on this? Many Thanks!
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf
You can put jax-ws-catalog.xml under META-INF within your application. So
that CXF will recognize it and use it. Details you can find in
org.apache.cxf.catalog.OASISCatalogManager.java.
Iris Ding
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Outsource-WSDL-XSD-jax-ws
37 matches
Mail list logo