We have 13 +1 votes from:
dkulp, davidb, jgenender, sergey, cschneider, colm, ffang, owulff, asoldano,
willem, ayoshida, jimma, JB
Most of them are binding. No other votes.
I'll get the artifacts promoted.
Dan
On Dec 7, 2012, at 9:41 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 110
+1
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Aki Yoshida wrote:
> +1
>
> Aki
>
> 2012/12/7 Daniel Kulp :
> >
> > We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number
> for a patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were
> ported back to 2.6.4, again, a large numbe
+1
Aki
2012/12/7 Daniel Kulp :
>
> We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number for
> a patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were ported
> back to 2.6.4, again, a large number.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.5.7
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/se
+1
Willem
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
(English)
http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: wil
+1
On 12/07/2012 03:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number for
> a patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were ported
> back to 2.6.4, again, a large number.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.5.7
> https://issues.
@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.7/2.6.4/2.7.1
+1
Freeman
－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u
+1
Freeman
－
Freeman(Yue) Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
On 2012-12-7, at 下午
+1.
Colm.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
> +1
>
> Christian
>
> On 07.12.2012 15:41, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number
> for a patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were
> ported ba
+1
Christian
On 07.12.2012 15:41, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number for
> a patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were ported
> back to 2.6.4, again, a large number.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.5.7
> https://issu
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 12/07/2012 03:41 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number for a
patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were ported back
to 2.6.4, again, a large number.
List of issues:
2.5.7
https:
+1,
thanks, Sergey
On 07/12/12 14:41, Daniel Kulp wrote:
We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number for a
patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were ported back
to 2.6.4, again, a large number.
List of issues:
2.5.7
https://issues.apach
+1
Jeff
On Dec 7, 2012, at 7:41 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number for
> a patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were ported
> back to 2.6.4, again, a large number.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.5.7
> htt
+1 from me too.
David
On 7 December 2012 14:41, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number
> for a patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were
> ported back to 2.6.4, again, a large number.
>
>
> List of issues:
> 2.5.
We've resolved over 110 issues since 2.7.0. That's a very large number for a
patch release so we definitely should get this out. Over 90 were ported back
to 2.6.4, again, a large number.
List of issues:
2.5.7
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310511&versio
14 matches
Mail list logo
