Actually, didn't see +1 votes from jgenender and sberyozkin. Thus, there are
12 +1 votes.
Dan
On Mon February 9 2009 2:02:54 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
> We have +1 votes from:
>
> dkulp, bharath, bmagulies, eglynn, seanoc, davidb, willem, ffang,
> cschneider, ubhole
>
> and no other votes. That
We have +1 votes from:
dkulp, bharath, bmagulies, eglynn, seanoc, davidb, willem, ffang, cschneider,
ubhole
and no other votes. That's 10 +1 votes. Thus, this vote passes. I'll
get the artifacts released to central.
Dan
On Thu February 5 2009 3:27:16 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
> (The is
+1
-- Ulhas
Daniel Kulp wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
Once again, t
+1
Daniel Kulp schrieb:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
Once again, there hav
+1
On Feb 6, 2009, at 3:24 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
+1
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote
on the
new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided
to go
ahead
and do a
+1
Freeman
Daniel Kulp wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
Once again, the
+1
Willem
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
> artifacts)
>
>
> Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
> and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
>
+1
David Bosschaert
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: 05 February 2009 20:27
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.10 (Take 2)
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 m
+1
+1
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the
new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go
ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a vote to release C
+1
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the
> new
> artifacts)
>
>
> Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go
> ahead
> and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
>
> This is a vo
+1
-Bharath
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> (The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the
> new
> artifacts)
>
>
> Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go
> ahead
> and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
>
> Th
(The issue with the J2EE has been corrected. This is a new vote on the new
artifacts)
Since it's been about 4 months since the 2.0.9 release, I decided to go ahead
and do a 2.0.10 release along with 2.1.4.
This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.10
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixe
14 matches
Mail list logo