+1 (no binding) for CXF 2.2.9 (tested in OW2 JOnAS)
Regards,
Florent
Alessio Soldano wrote:
+1
After a couple of local changes, I see no regressions in the
jbossws-cxf testsuite using CXF 2.2.9.
Cheers
Alessio
Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2
We have 13 +1 votes and no other votes. Thus, this vote passes. I'll get
the artifacts released.
Thanks!
Dan
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 1:46:39 pm Daniel Kulp wrote:
> This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The
> main reason for the releases is to fix a potentia
+1
After a couple of local changes, I see no regressions in the jbossws-cxf
testsuite using CXF 2.2.9.
Cheers
Alessio
Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that will
+1
--
Craig Tataryn
site: http://www.basementcoders.com/
podcast:http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBasementCoders
irc: ThaDon on freenode #basementcoders, ##wicket, #papernapkin
twitter: craiger
On 2010-06-03, at 1:36 AM, Cyrille Le Clerc wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Daniel Kulp
+1
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
> reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that will
> be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included despite us not
+1
David
On 02/06/2010, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
> reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that
> will
> be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included despite us
> not
> real
+1
Thanks,
Bharath
On Thursday, June 3, 2010, Johan Edstrom wrote:
> +1 Non important person.
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
>>> reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that
>>> will
>>> be disclosed soon
+1 Non important person.
>
>
>>
>> This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
>> reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that
>> will
>> be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included despite us
>> not
>> really "
+1
Willem
Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that will
be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included despite us not
really "supporting" those bra
+1
Freeman
On 2010-6-3, at 上午1:46, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9.
The main
reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability
that will
be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included
despite us not
+1
Am 02.06.2010 19:46, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that will
be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included despite us not
really "supporti
+1
Jeff
On Jun 2, 2010, at 11:46 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
> reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that
> will
> be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included despit
ags/cxf-2.0.13
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.1.10
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.2.9
>
>
> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dk...@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>
>
+1
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The
> main
> reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that
> will
> be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included despite us
This is a vote to release CXF versions 2.0.13, 2.1.10, and 2.2.9. The main
reason for the releases is to fix a potential security vulnerability that will
be disclosed soon. That is why 2.0.13 and 2.1.10 are included despite us not
really "supporting" those branches anymore.
The only change
15 matches
Mail list logo
