On Thursday 11 November 2010 4:49:46 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> Dan,
>
> I can't believe that anyone is using it the way I wrote it, and I
> consider the old behavior pretty seriously broken. So, I'd like to
> take the position that 2.3.1 is mopping up some 2.3.0 leftovers, and
> go ahead and pu
Dan,
I can't believe that anyone is using it the way I wrote it, and I
consider the old behavior pretty seriously broken. So, I'd like to
take the position that 2.3.1 is mopping up some 2.3.0 leftovers, and
go ahead and push it out. If someone complains, I'll add compatibility
control code for 2.3
Benson,
In your opinion, should CXF-3056 be merged to 2.3.1 or not?You mention
it's not exactly compatible so I'm guessing not, but I'd like to make sure.
If not, we'll need to start the 2.4 migration guide and add the note about it.
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
