On Friday 17 December 2010 4:32:12 am Jim Ma wrote:
> Hi Freeman ,
>
> This failure is introduced in this commit :
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1050167&view=rev.
> Dan, is your change in rev. 1050167 with Freeman's modification are
> what you meant to optimize ?
Yea. Exactly that. I'm n
Hi Freeman ,
This failure is introduced in this commit :
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1050167&view=rev.
Dan, is your change in rev. 1050167 with Freeman's modification are
what you meant to optimize ?
Thanks,
Jim
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Freeman Fang wrote:
> Ok, we also need add
>
Ok, we also need add
soapMessage.getInterceptorChain().add(ending);
in checkUltimateReceiverHeaders method after a SoapFault set to
SoapMessage and so that this fault could be thrown after
OnewayProcessorInterceptor.
Create CXF-3200[1] to track it and will commit fix soon.
[1]https://issues
Hi,
This test also failed on Hudson CI, so I investigate it a little bit
and found that this commit[1] cause this problem.
Before this change, the MustUnderstandEndingInterceptor is added for
server side in any case, after this change,
MustUnderstandEndingInterceptor is only added for ser
Guys,
I saw this failure today from my side, any guy else also saw it?
Regards
Freeman
--
Freeman Fang
FuseSource: http://fusesource.com
blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/freemanfang
Apache Servicemix:http://servicemix.apache.org
Apache
