Hi John,
Sorry for the delay, but yes, that is an expected validation. Thanks for
catching it!
Andy
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 8:18 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
> I pushed up a fix. Andy, whenever you get a chance can you take a look
> and confirm this validation is expected as well?
>
> On 2017-12
I pushed up a fix. Andy, whenever you get a chance can you take a look and
confirm this validation is expected as well?
On 2017-12-22 08:16, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Local, Java 1.8.0_144
>
> Sergey
> On 22/12/17 13:05, John D. Ament wrote:
> > This is on your local or in jenkins?
> >
> > T
Local, Java 1.8.0_144
Sergey
On 22/12/17 13:05, John D. Ament wrote:
This is on your local or in jenkins?
This was passing at one point, but I see it failing locally right now. Will
take a look.
John
On 2017-12-22 05:52, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi John
Consistently seeing:
Method
Invali
This is on your local or in jenkins?
This was passing at one point, but I see it failing locally right now. Will
take a look.
John
On 2017-12-22 05:52, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi John
>
> Consistently seeing:
>
> Method
> InvalidInterfaceTest.testExceptionThrownWhenInterfaceHasMethodWit
Hi John
Consistently seeing:
Method
InvalidInterfaceTest.testExceptionThrownWhenInterfaceHasMethodWithPathParamAnnotationButNoURITemplate()[pri:0,
instance:org.eclipse.microprofile.rest.client.tck.InvalidInterfaceTest@17579e0f]
should have thrown an exception of type class
org.eclipse.microp
