Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-21 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 weibo: @Freeman小屋 On 2013-9-19, at 上午1:08, Daniel Kulp wrote:

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-20 Thread Andrei Shakirin
+1 (non binding) > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Mittwoch, 18. September 2013 19:09 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2 > > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > 2.6

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-20 Thread Jim Ma
+1 On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Oliver Wulff wrote: > +1 > > Oli > > > > From: Aki Yoshida [elak...@gmail.com] > Sent: 19 September 2013 22:04 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - ta

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-19 Thread Oliver Wulff
+1 Oli From: Aki Yoshida [elak...@gmail.com] Sent: 19 September 2013 22:04 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2 +1 aki 2013/9/18 Daniel Kulp : > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and al

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-19 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 aki 2013/9/18 Daniel Kulp : > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some regressions in the JAX-WS TCK as > well as some issues within Eclipse RCP framework. > > > This also includes an update release of our build-ut

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-19 Thread Jason Pell
+1 (non binding) On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some regressions in the JAX-WS TCK as > well as some issues within Eclipse RCP framework. > > > This also inclu

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-19 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 8:54 AM, David Bosschaert < david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > David > > > On 18 September 2013 18:08, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > > 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-19 Thread David Bosschaert
+1 David On 18 September 2013 18:08, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some regressions in the JAX-WS TCK as > well as some issues within Eclipse RCP framework. > > > This also includes an updat

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-19 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Christian On 18.09.2013 19:08, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some regressions in the JAX-WS TCK as well as some issues within Eclipse RCP framework. This also includes an update release of ou

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-18 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
+1 - Dennis On 09/19/2013 05:08 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some regressions in the JAX-WS TCK as well as some issues within Eclipse RCP framework. This also includes an update release o

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-18 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Sergey On 18/09/13 18:08, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some regressions in the JAX-WS TCK as well as some issues within Eclipse RCP framework. This also includes an update release of our bui

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-18 Thread Alessio Soldano
+1 On 18/09/13 19:08, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some regressions in the JAX-WS TCK as well as some issues within Eclipse RCP framework. This also includes an update release of our build-utils

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 - take 2

2013-09-18 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff On Sep 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > 2.6.10. This second attempt fixes some regressions in the JAX-WS TCK as > well as some issues within Eclipse RCP framework. > > > This also includes

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-17 Thread Christian Müller
I'm wondering whether the -1 is for both release candidates or only for one of them... Best, Christian - Software Integration Specialist Apache Camel committer: https://camel.apache.org/team V.P. Apache Camel: https://www.apache.org/foundation/ Apache Member: https://www.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-17 Thread Harsha Thirimanna
+1 *Harsha Thirimanna* Senior Software Engineer; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com * ** email: **hars...@wso2.com* * cell: +94 71 5186770** twitter: **http://twitter.com/ ** harshathirimann linked-in: **http:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-17 Thread Alessio Soldano
Sorry guys, same reasoning here. If tck regressions (on 2.7.7) are enough for justifying a -1, here is mine. Alessio On 17/09/13 12:31, Jim Ma wrote: I have to -1 this release if tck result is a matter. After the tck check, there are some failures related to DispatchImpl. I am chasing these fa

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-17 Thread Jim Ma
I have to -1 this release if tck result is a matter. After the tck check, there are some failures related to DispatchImpl. I am chasing these failures. Cheers, Jim On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Andrei Shakirin wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > > -Original Message- > > From: Daniel Kulp

RE: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-17 Thread Andrei Shakirin
+1 (non binding) > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] > Sent: Samstag, 14. September 2013 14:37 > To: dev@cxf.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10 > > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > 2.6.10. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-16 Thread Aki Yoshida
+1 regards, aki 2013/9/14 Daniel Kulp : > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10. > > This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD stuff > needed to work with the latest Eclipse. > > > List of issues: > 2.6.10 > https://issues

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-16 Thread Freeman Fang
+1 － Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/ Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042 weibo: @Freeman小屋 On 2013-9-14, at 下午8:36, Daniel Kulp wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-16 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Willem jiang wrote: > +1 > > I just did a quick test by running the Apache CXF 2.7.7 with Camel > 2.13-SNAPSHOT. > All the test passed. > > -- > Willem Jiang > > Red Hat, Inc. > Web: http://www.redhat.com > Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-16 Thread Willem jiang
+1 I just did a quick test by running the Apache CXF 2.7.7 with Camel 2.13-SNAPSHOT. All the test passed. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-16 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 I have some classloading issues on Eclipse RCP with CXF 2.7.7. The exception says the BindingProvider interface is not visible when creating a JAXWS client. Does anyone else here use CXF with Eclipse RCP and can give it a try? The problem is not big enough in my opinion to stop the release

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-16 Thread David Bosschaert
+1 David On 14 September 2013 13:36, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > 2.6.10. > > This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD > stuff needed to work with the latest Eclipse. > > > List of issues: > 2.6.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-15 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
+1 Sergey On 14/09/13 13:36, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10. This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD stuff needed to work with the latest Eclipse. List of issues: 2.6.10 https://issues.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-14 Thread Jason Pell
+1 (non binding) On 14/09/2013 10:37 PM, "Daniel Kulp" wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to > 2.6.10. > > This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD > stuff needed to work with the latest Eclipse. > > > List of issues: > 2

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-14 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
+1 - Dennis On 09/15/2013 12:36 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10. This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD stuff needed to work with the latest Eclipse. List of issues: 2.6.10 https://issue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.7.7/2.6.10

2013-09-14 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff On Sep 14, 2013, at 6:36 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > We've resolved over 90 issues since 2.7.6 and almost 50 ported back to 2.6.10. > > This also includes an update release of our build-utils to get the PMD stuff > needed to work with the latest Eclipse. > > > List of issues: > 2