Well the separator suppression code has not had a lot of scrutiny. I wrote this
a *long time* ago, and honestly have not revisited it since. I assume you
figured out that separatorSuppressionPolicy replaced the separatorPolicy
property. This happened after IBM released it's first DFDL product, a
Hey Mike,
Wanted to get your opinion on the issue I've been running into with
IBM4690-TLOG schemas. I talked with Steve for a while trying to figure out
what was going on and we came to the opinion that there is either an issue with
the TLOG schemas, or (perhaps more likely) there is an error
You need the SGA to do a relicense, yes. However, there is nothing
blocking you from doing a release here at Apache, with the code licensed
under BSD. We just have to make sure the original licenses are intact, and
watch for any modifications to the files under the IBM SGA. If NCSA is days
away f
Hi
(1) It is recommended that you release using old infrastructure. You should add
the DISCLAIMER. You should say that it is a maintenance release as the project
transitions to the ASF.
(2) If you need any help with the IBM SGA then let the mentors know. If John
agrees then this type of discus
Ok, so I'd like to put the changes on the support branch, also on master
branch, but then not release it.
Should we consider pushing the support branch to NCSA servers - as branch
2.0.1, and then do a release from that infrastructure? This is a very small set
of changes, but a release is much
Github user stevedlawrence commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/6
+1
---
Github user stevedlawrence commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/6#discussion_r153242194
--- Diff:
daffodil-core/src/test/scala-new/edu/illinois/ncsa/daffodil/dsom/TestIsScannable.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/* Copyright (c
Github user mbeckerle commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/6#discussion_r153241928
--- Diff:
daffodil-core/src/test/scala-new/edu/illinois/ncsa/daffodil/dsom/TestIsScannable.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/* Copyright (c) 201
Github user stevedlawrence commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/6#discussion_r153196922
--- Diff:
daffodil-core/src/test/scala-new/edu/illinois/ncsa/daffodil/dsom/TestIsScannable.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+/* Copyright (c
Github user stevedlawrence commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/6#discussion_r153195913
--- Diff:
daffodil-core/src/main/scala/edu/illinois/ncsa/daffodil/dsom/TermEncodingMixin.scala
---
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ trait TermEncodingMi
Github user stevedlawrence commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/6
It would be nice if there was a commit message that explained the changes,
and what was wrong with the previous code. It makes sense after looking at it,
but I had to look up what No
There are a couple of potential issues with this:
1) The sbt build infrastructure currently depends on branches and tags
named a certain way. The new branch/tag guidelines break that. Pull
request #3 [1] fixes this and adds "Apache" and "incubating" where
appropriate. This needs an additional +1 b
12 matches
Mail list logo
