Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release

2019-12-20 Thread Adams, Joshua
+1 I'd be happy to take a crack at doing a release next time. Josh On Dec 20, 2019 7:39 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote: I think we're overdue for another release, and we have a lot of nice features and bug fixes that people should start using. This includes UDFs, BLOBs, unordered sequences, improved

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release

2019-12-20 Thread Sloane, Brandon
+1 From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 9:42 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release Yeah, I'm assuming there's going to be some wrinkles with the new container release process, and since I'

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release

2019-12-20 Thread Steve Lawrence
_ > From: Steve Lawrence > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 7:30 AM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release > > I think we're overdue for another release, and we have a lot of nice > features and bug fixes that people should start us

Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release

2019-12-20 Thread Beckerle, Mike
system, I will table my concern. The release after this should definitely be someone else. -mikeb From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 7:30 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release I think we're overdue for

[DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release

2019-12-20 Thread Steve Lawrence
I think we're overdue for another release, and we have a lot of nice features and bug fixes that people should start using. This includes UDFs, BLOBs, unordered sequences, improved type safety, initial compiler speed up changes, 2GB+ file support, and much more. And all non work-in-progress pull re