+1
I'd be happy to take a crack at doing a release next time.
Josh
On Dec 20, 2019 7:39 AM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
I think we're overdue for another release, and we have a lot of nice
features and bug fixes that people should start using. This includes
UDFs, BLOBs, unordered sequences, improved
+1
From: Steve Lawrence
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 9:42 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release
Yeah, I'm assuming there's going to be some wrinkles with the new
container release process, and since I'
_
> From: Steve Lawrence
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 7:30 AM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release
>
> I think we're overdue for another release, and we have a lot of nice
> features and bug fixes that people should start us
system, I will table my concern. The release after this should
definitely be someone else.
-mikeb
From: Steve Lawrence
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 7:30 AM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.5.0 Release
I think we're overdue for
I think we're overdue for another release, and we have a lot of nice
features and bug fixes that people should start using. This includes
UDFs, BLOBs, unordered sequences, improved type safety, initial compiler
speed up changes, 2GB+ file support, and much more. And all non
work-in-progress pull re