Re: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability

2019-09-06 Thread Beckerle, Mike
tember 6, 2019 2:25 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability Sounds great. I do like the idea of including official UDFs with actual functionality that we currently don't support, so it'd useful in that sense, but could also act as a model to fo

Re: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability

2019-09-06 Thread Kilo, Olabusayo
lways >> part of the standard build, not because they are useful, but because they >> allow us to test the UDF system. >> >> >> An important test case is also to define such a UDF which throws an >> exception, so that we can have tests that verify the exception

Re: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability

2019-09-06 Thread Kilo, Olabusayo
Brandon Sloane had suggested the following on the wiki Our service provider only offers a lookup function. We might also want it to offer a way of querying a list of all defined functions. I like the idea as it can be used to access all the function classes of each provider without actually ins

Re: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability

2019-09-06 Thread Kilo, Olabusayo
<mailto:ok...@tresys.com> Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 10:30 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org<mailto:dev@daffodil.apache.org> <mailto:dev@daffodil.apache.org> Subject: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability I'm requesting a discussion on the addition of the User De

Re: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability

2019-09-06 Thread Steve Lawrence
test case is also to define such a UDF which throws an > exception, so that we can have tests that verify the exception is properly > caught and reported. > > > From: Kilo, Olabusayo > Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 10:30 AM > To: dev@daffo

Re: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability

2019-09-06 Thread Beckerle, Mike
AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability I'm requesting a discussion on the addition of the User Defined Functions capability to daffodil. The proposal referenced below provides a possible solution for Daffodil to be able to process and use User Defined Functions

Re: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability

2019-09-06 Thread Beckerle, Mike
ity in any system is that once defined, a UDF call is as indistinguishable from a built-in function as possible. From: Kilo, Olabusayo Sent: Friday, September 6, 2019 10:30 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capabili

[DISCUSS] User Defined Functions Capability

2019-09-06 Thread Kilo, Olabusayo
I'm requesting a discussion on the addition of the User Defined Functions capability to daffodil. The proposal referenced below provides a possible solution for Daffodil to be able to process and use User Defined Functions referenced in the DFDL Schema. The original request can be found at htt