Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-06 Thread Mike Beckerle
ssary? ...mike beckerle From: John D. Ament Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 1:29 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2 On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:12 PM Mike Beckerle wrote: > John, > > > This is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-06 Thread Steve Lawrence
Thanks for your recommendation. I've pushed those changes to PR-51, which I think now satisfies all concerns raised regarding the LICENSE/NOTICE files. If you could do a quick skim of the new files to make sure everything looks reasonable, that would be greatly appreciated. The files on github are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-06 Thread John D. Ament
Steve On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 8:39 AM Steve Lawrence wrote: > On 03/05/2018 01:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:12 PM Mike Beckerle > wrote: > > > >> John, > >> > >> > >> This issue is one of the last remaining things we need to resolve. > >> > >>> > >>> 4) Snippets from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-06 Thread Steve Lawrence
On 03/05/2018 01:29 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:12 PM Mike Beckerle wrote: > >> John, >> >> >> This issue is one of the last remaining things we need to resolve. >> >>> >>> 4) Snippets from the OGF DFDL spec. These snippets are scattered >>> throughout multiple files, but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-05 Thread John D. Ament
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:12 PM Mike Beckerle wrote: > John, > > > This issue is one of the last remaining things we need to resolve. > > > > > 4) Snippets from the OGF DFDL spec. These snippets are scattered > > throughout multiple files, but are all located in an "ibm-tests" and > > "ibm-contrib

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-05 Thread Mike Beckerle
John, This issue is one of the last remaining things we need to resolve. > > 4) Snippets from the OGF DFDL spec. These snippets are scattered > throughout multiple files, but are all located in an "ibm-tests" and > "ibm-contributed" directories. A grep for "Open Grid Forum" will show > find the

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-02 Thread Steve Lawrence
The VOTE to release rc2 of Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0 is now closed. With a total of +5, and NO -1 votes, the VOTE passes. Overall vote breakdown is as follows: +1 John D. Ament (binding) +1 Steve Lawrence +1 Mike Beckerle +1 Josh Adams +1 Dave Thompson Thanks to everyone who voted. I'll

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-01 Thread Dave Thompson
: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2 Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2. All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.1.0-rc2/ St

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-02-20 Thread Joshua Adams
My vote +1 Josh Adams From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 2:46:25 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2 Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-02-17 Thread John D. Ament
Steve, Comments in line about the source release. I don't believe any of these issues block the release, so if you can create JIRA ticket(s) to solve in the next release that's fine (you can reference those ticket(s) in the release vote on IPMC as well). I've done a partial review of the binary,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-02-16 Thread Steve Lawrence
In the source release, the root has a LICENSE file that mentions four "subcomponents" that have non-Apache licenses, and includes the full license text for each of those components. Those components are: 1) Passera library: BSD-style license, this is everything in daffodil-lib/src/main/scala/pa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-02-16 Thread John D. Ament
Hi, I'll make time this weekend to review (source looks mostly OK see below, but want to review the binary), but I see the following issues: - LICENSE and NOTICE files are mixed up. In the LICENSE file you're supposed to include all licenses for the source code contained in the bundle. This wou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-02-16 Thread Mike Beckerle
My vote +1 From: Steve Lawrence Sent: Friday, February 16, 2018 2:46:25 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2 Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2.

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-02-16 Thread Steve Lawrence
Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2. All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.1.0-rc2/ Staging artifacts can be found at: https://repository.apache.o