[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-10 Thread Mike Beckerle
Officially canceling the VOTE for 3.8.0-rc1. I'll create an rc2 and start a new VOTE. VOTE thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread/sy0nq9jjoyk79jshj5dmcngn41t4f3do On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:22 AM Steve Lawrence wrote: > > -1 > > I am unable to verify the gpg signatures. When verifying all of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-10 Thread Steve Lawrence
-1 I am unable to verify the gpg signatures. When verifying all of the .asc files I get the error: gpg: Signature made Thu 06 Jun 2024 01:42:36 PM EDT gpg:using RSA key 4B6A956D3ED3650268802E37274B8F1413A680AF gpg: Can't check signature: No public key I don't see this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-10 Thread Kilo, Olabusayo
): "folllowing" -- Lola Kilo From: Mike Beckerle Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2024 2:10 PM To: Kilo, Olabusayo Cc: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1 Lola, I retested the URLs you mention and both work fine for me

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-08 Thread Mike Beckerle
I'll look at this again monday, but I was watching progress using VisualVM, and the GC overhead is minimal (under 10%). The system was definitely not thrashing. There was some free memory. Note also that the output files from the compilation are still small-ish (8MBytes). One curious thing was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-08 Thread Steve Lawrence
I remember testing that schema with 3.7.0 and it did not take that long to compile, and I don't think there have been any real changes to compilation in 3.8.0. Maybe this is a memory issue? daffodilPackageBin forks a process for compilation so if that process doesn't have enough memory it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-08 Thread Mike Beckerle
-1 binding [OK] Verified all signatures, md5, sha1, sha512, etc. Log of that is at the bottom of this message: [OK] Regression tested 79 DFDL schemas that Owl has in a repository. All that are expected to pass, either passed immediately, or passed once the schemas were adapted for the new layers

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-08 Thread Mike Beckerle
and source > [OK] Successfully used apache-daffodil-3.8.0-bin.tgz > [OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct > > > > -- > Lola Kilo > > From: Mike Beckerle > Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 2:38 PM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-07 Thread Kilo, Olabusayo
ScalaDoc are correct -- Lola Kilo From: Mike Beckerle Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 2:38 PM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1 Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1. All distribution

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1

2024-06-06 Thread Mike Beckerle
Hi all, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil 3.8.0-rc1. All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/daffodil/3.8.0-rc1/ Staging artifacts can be found at: