Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem

2021-10-18 Thread Mike Beckerle
to data that is > verified at unparse. > > > > > > ________ > > From: Steve Lawrence > > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 9:50 AM > > To: dev@daffodil

Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem

2021-10-18 Thread Attila Horvath
om: Steve Lawrence > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 9:50 AM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem > > Interesting idea. > > I was thinking you could do something like this once we have this new > feature implemented

Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem

2021-09-17 Thread Beckerle, Mike
rence Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 9:50 AM To: dev@daffodil.apache.org Subject: Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem Interesting idea. I was thinking you could do something like this once we have this new feature implemented:

Re: Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem

2021-08-30 Thread Steve Lawrence
Interesting idea. I was thinking you could do something like this once we have this new feature implemented: http://www.ogf.org/dfdl/";> So we parse and checksum the entire data foramt

Fwd: FW: DFDL: potential problem

2021-08-25 Thread Attila Horvath
*Subject:* DFDL: potential problem ALCON re: idea for checksum calculations in DFDL We may have a potential ‘situation’ as part of our DFDL/Daffodil offering as follow