Re: Theoretical Interest item - Pull Request with example schema that illustrates pathological (super-exponential) DFDL behaviors

2024-02-07 Thread Mike Beckerle
ke Beckerle > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 1:55 PM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: EXT: Theoretical Interest item - Pull Request with example schema > that illustrates pathological (super-exponential) DFDL behaviors > > I have been concerned for a while that combination

Re: Theoretical Interest item - Pull Request with example schema that illustrates pathological (super-exponential) DFDL behaviors

2024-02-07 Thread Mike Beckerle
enting. A schema compile time check would > be even better if a way is found to formally prove the theoretical O(sn) > constraint. > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Beckerle > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 1:55 PM > To: dev@daffodil.apache.org > Subject: EXT:

RE: Theoretical Interest item - Pull Request with example schema that illustrates pathological (super-exponential) DFDL behaviors

2024-01-24 Thread Interrante, John A (GE Aerospace, US)
rg Subject: EXT: Theoretical Interest item - Pull Request with example schema that illustrates pathological (super-exponential) DFDL behaviors I have been concerned for a while that combinations of the features in DFDL v1.0 can be used in ways that are just far too powerful for what is needed for data fo

Theoretical Interest item - Pull Request with example schema that illustrates pathological (super-exponential) DFDL behaviors

2024-01-24 Thread Mike Beckerle
I have been concerned for a while that combinations of the features in DFDL v1.0 can be used in ways that are just far too powerful for what is needed for data format expression. For example, if the input data to parse is n bits, how large should the corresponding infoset be when the data is parse