Lawrence; dev@daffodil.apache.org; Mike Beckerle
Subject: Re: Unordered Sequence and Choice Branch Violations
So having implemented this approach, Steve, I've run into a bit of a snafu.
What I've done is that I modified the UnorderedSequenceCombinator to use the
AltComp and RepUnbounded parsers
oes not exist.
>
> Which brings me to two possible solutions:
>
> 1. Somehow detect that we're running an expression from within a choice and
> 'hide/skip' choiceElements. Likely meaning we'll have to prepend an extra
> ../ somewhere. This adds some unnecessary complexit
oes not exist.
>
> Which brings me to two possible solutions:
>
> 1. Somehow detect that we're running an expression from within a choice and
> 'hide/skip' choiceElements. Likely meaning we'll have to prepend an extra
> ../ somewhere. This adds some unnecessary comp
eve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 1:37:46 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org; Taylor Wise; Mike Beckerle
Subject: Re: Unordered Sequence and Choice Branch Violations
On 11/17/2017 01:13 PM, Taylor Wise wrote:
> While executing some existing tests I've c
While executing some existing tests I've come across a case that I need
guidance on.
Given the following test case:
Schema Definition Error
Expression
../e3
navigates to another branch
e3
The result of the test is the following:
