Re: [dba-dev] MWS builds and SRB development

Hi Zoltán, It is a possible to attach to any MWS, versions of SRB which allows new features supported in main code, same way as dictionaries installed with OOo? bundling extensions with the OOo distribution is technically easily possible, but a political issue. People need to decide and

Re: [dba-dev] MWS builds and SRB development

Hi Frank, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany írta: Hi Zoltán, It is a possible to attach to any MWS, versions of SRB which allows new features supported in main code, same way as dictionaries installed with OOo? bundling extensions with the OOo distribution is technically

Re: [dba-dev] MWS builds and SRB development

Moin, On 12.02.09 09:18, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Zoltán, It is a possible to attach to any MWS, versions of SRB which allows new features supported in main code, same way as dictionaries installed with OOo? bundling extensions with the OOo distribution

Re: [dba-dev] MWS builds and SRB development

Hi Ocke, Ocke Janssen írta: Moin, On 12.02.09 09:18, Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote: Hi Zoltán, It is a possible to attach to any MWS, versions of SRB which allows new features supported in main code, same way as dictionaries installed with OOo? bundling

[dba-dev] About hiding the new interface XRecovery for FormDocument

Hi, A new interface com.sun.star.frame.XRecovery is being designed. It will be used by the autorecovery service inside the framework module and supported by all applications. FormDocument of database, which is not used as a top level document, will ignore the new interface. Currently,