Re: RHEV-M driver unit tests, EC2 fronted tests and 1.8 fixes

2012-07-27 Thread Ronelle Landy
> From: "David Lutterkort" > To: dev@deltacloud.apache.org > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 5:04:06 PM > Subject: Re: RHEV-M driver unit tests, EC2 fronted tests and 1.8 fixes > > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 14:28 +0200, Michal Fojtik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The problem under 1.8 seems missing 'require "r

Re: RHEV-M driver unit tests, EC2 fronted tests and 1.8 fixes

2012-07-27 Thread David Lutterkort
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 14:28 +0200, Michal Fojtik wrote: > Hi, > > The problem under 1.8 seems missing 'require "rubygems"' on top > of 'test_helper.rb'. Adding that solved this problem. > > I applied David patches on top of my patches + added the EC2 front-end > patches. > > Everything seems to

ApacheConEU Cloud Track CFP

2012-07-27 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks, Pardon my intrusion - just wanted to call attention to the fact that ApacheConEU has a dedicated Cloud track, and CFP is now open (and imminently closing as well). Please do consider submitting cloud talk proposals, Important dates: 3rd August, 2012: Talk proposals due. 19th August, 20

RHEV-M driver unit tests, EC2 fronted tests and 1.8 fixes

2012-07-27 Thread Michal Fojtik
Hi, The problem under 1.8 seems missing 'require "rubygems"' on top of 'test_helper.rb'. Adding that solved this problem. I applied David patches on top of my patches + added the EC2 front-end patches. Everything seems to play nicely together though now it is more than 20 patches ;-) (I know I p

[jira] [Commented] (DTACLOUD-265) Unable to describe in detail key, firewall, realm, image with eucalyptus driver

2012-07-27 Thread Deepika Agrawal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DTACLOUD-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13423800#comment-13423800 ] Deepika Agrawal commented on DTACLOUD-265: -- Yes exactly this is the problem. Th

[jira] [Commented] (DTACLOUD-265) Unable to describe in detail key, firewall, realm, image with eucalyptus driver

2012-07-27 Thread Michal Fojtik (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DTACLOUD-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13423795#comment-13423795 ] Michal Fojtik commented on DTACLOUD-265: OK update: def image(credentials,

RE: [PATCH core 9/9] Core: Make new image action not require the instance

2012-07-27 Thread Koper, Dies
ACK Could you commit my change for fgcp_driver.rb (attached to the issue) with it too? # destroying a running SLB, etc. on /ALREADY_STARTED/ do - status 502 #? + status 405 end # trying to start a running vserver, etc. on /ILLEGAL_STATE/ do - status 502 +

[jira] [Commented] (DTACLOUD-265) Unable to describe in detail key, firewall, realm, image with eucalyptus driver

2012-07-27 Thread Michal Fojtik (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DTACLOUD-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13423791#comment-13423791 ] Michal Fojtik commented on DTACLOUD-265: Deepika you're right! The has_capabilit

[jira] [Comment Edited] (DTACLOUD-265) Unable to describe in detail key, firewall, realm, image with eucalyptus driver

2012-07-27 Thread Deepika Agrawal (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DTACLOUD-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13423026#comment-13423026 ] Deepika Agrawal edited comment on DTACLOUD-265 at 7/27/12 9:24 AM: ---

Re: [PATCH core 11/16] Core: Check if instance used to create new image exists correctly

2012-07-27 Thread Michal Fojtik
On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:35 AM, Koper, Dies wrote: > Hi Michal, > > For consistency's sake, could you resolve 214 then? There is a patch > attached. > (of course other providers may need changes too). Yes, I have this patch on the list already, it is part of the 1/9 serie: [PATCH core 9/9] Core: M

Re: [PATCH core 1/7] RHEV-M: Fixed bug that cause instance not pick up image_id

2012-07-27 Thread Michal Fojtik
On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:32 AM, Koper, Dies wrote: >> driver.instance(:id => 'unknown') => nil >> driver.instances(:id => 'unknown') => [] >> >> I think this behavior is more easy to understand that capturing > different >> kinds of exceptions. What do you think? > > How does this relate to the RES

Re: Two small patches

2012-07-27 Thread Michal Fojtik
Hi, ACK both. I was a bit concerned about bundler in Linux environment vs. RPM. The bundler will fail to find the correct gems if they are not installed in the system with correct version. But then I realized, that 'rake' is really a devel tool and people will use 'bundle' anyway. Michal Fojti