well I asked cause I used it and found something to replace in junit
for everything (all you speak about)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/12/2 Mark Struber
I use it ;P
Nah, testNG is really cool if you have a bit of a mixture of pure unit tests
with a slight touch of integration testing. groups, parallel executions,
shuffled executions, etc. _really_ useful stuff!
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
> To: de
Which gain supporting testng?
Testng supports junit iirc
Le 2 déc. 2013 18:11, "Christian Kaltepoth" a
écrit :
> I really like this. So +1 for adding it. Great work Gerhard. :)
>
> And I agree with Mark that we should also support TestNG later. So the
> module name should indicate that it is JUn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13836702#comment-13836702
]
Thomas Andraschko commented on DELTASPIKE-453:
--
+1 Romain
It may not work
I really like this. So +1 for adding it. Great work Gerhard. :)
And I agree with Mark that we should also support TestNG later. So the
module name should indicate that it is JUnit specific.
Christian
2013/12/2 Gerhard Petracek
> hi @ all,
>
> please have a look at [1].
>
> it's just a first (
Hi Gerhard,
thats what i thought.
Unfortunately i can't upgrade, as the most of our customers use JavaEE6
servers.
So i hope that a CODI-Like mode could be added!
Regards,
Thomas
2013/12/2 Gerhard Petracek
> hi thomas,
>
> if you can upgrade to jsf 2.2, you can use ClientWindowRenderMode.DELE
hi thomas,
if you can upgrade to jsf 2.2, you can use ClientWindowRenderMode.DELEGATED
(+ configure "url" for javax.faces.CLIENT_WINDOW_MODE).
regards,
gerhard
2013/11/27 Thomas Andraschko
> Hi,
>
> i always get a loading screen with the new DS window handling.
> Is there a chance to get the
we have something like it in openejb and it is really nicer than
arquillian for real apps and unit tests since you don't need
deployment or heavy enrichments processes
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Gi
Different purpose.
For arquillian to be useful for such business apps it would be required to
support multiple 'deployment groups' which would share a single @Deployment for
many unit test classes.
That would be utter cool, but doesn't exist yet...
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message ---
hi john,
the basic idea of this thin/simple integration is to be independent of
arquillian.
regards,
gerhard
2013/12/2 John D. Ament
> I'd personally prefer to see this as an Arquillian add on, especially
> since the embedded containers have such little over head.
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at
Gerhard Petracek created DELTASPIKE-456:
---
Summary: wildfly-build-managed profile
Key: DELTASPIKE-456
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-456
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue
I'd personally prefer to see this as an Arquillian add on, especially
since the embedded containers have such little over head.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>
> yup +1
>
> TestNG support would also be handy later.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>>
yup +1
TestNG support would also be handy later.
LieGrue,
strub
>
> From: Thomas Andraschko
>To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 11:22
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control
>
>
>+1
>simple and nice approach
>
>
>
>2013/12
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved DELTASPIKE-455.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> unify literal-packages
> --
>
>
Gerhard Petracek created DELTASPIKE-455:
---
Summary: unify literal-packages
Key: DELTASPIKE-455
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-455
Project: DeltaSpike
Issue Type: T
+1
simple and nice approach
2013/12/2 Gerhard Petracek
> hi @ all,
>
> please have a look at [1].
>
> it's just a first (and quick) draft based on major use-cases.
> however, it's working already and the api/spi is minimal -> we can think
> about adding it to deltaspike.
> (it's already prepare
hi @ all,
please have a look at [1].
it's just a first (and quick) draft based on major use-cases.
however, it's working already and the api/spi is minimal -> we can think
about adding it to deltaspike.
(it's already prepared for additional use-cases, however, for sure we can
simplify/change/impr
17 matches
Mail list logo
