Re: Wildfly 9 Tests?

2015-08-17 Thread John D. Ament
I don't believe I said there was a need for a separate profile. It looks like the main issue is that ${wildfly.version} also points to the arquillian container. So an entry like this: dependency groupIdorg.wildfly/groupId

Re: Wildfly 9 Tests?

2015-08-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi john, we added ci-jobs for wildfly8.x several months ago and for wildfly9 some weeks ago. there is no need for separated profiles - see e.g. [1], [2], [3] and [4]. regards, gerhard [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/job/DeltaSpike_Wildfly_8.1/ [2]

Re: Wildfly 9 Tests?

2015-08-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@john: you didn't mention the remote-profile in your initial mail. what we maintain actively are the build-managed profiles, because we need them for [1]. all remote profiles are for external tests and if something doesn't work or is missing, we need to change it. @marvin: the same is true for

RE: Wildfly 9 Tests?

2015-08-16 Thread Marvin Toll
Now that IBM finally got an EE7 server certified (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaee/overview/compatibility-jsp-136984.html )... does it make sense to add them to the suite (particularly if we are going to add Wildfly 9)? _Marvin -Original Message- From: John D. Ament

Re: Wildfly 9 Tests?

2015-08-16 Thread John D. Ament
Marvin, It's definitely worth starting the conversations about. Personally, I feel like the switch of impls between OWB and Weld may create a lot of regression issues, but I've seen pretty quick turn around from the devs on it (just not as quick of a release schedule). John On Sun, Aug 16,