Hi!
I am using the Apache Directory Server (RC3). I have created sample users in a domain of objectClass inetOrgPerson and executed a couple of queries and the following query has a problem!
(&((objectClass=inetOrgPerson) (!(objectClass=person)) (!(objectClass=organizationalPerson)) (cn=*)(sn=*
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-688?page=comments#action_12425067
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-688:
-
Ok, I copied the new MANIFST.MF file to the right place.
I think that the fix has been fixed :)
Tha
Hi guys !
We have just merged the optimization-trunks into the trunks,
shared-0.9.5-trunks and the 1.0-trunks.
The official trunks are now :
- trunks for on going work on 1.1 version
- branches/1.0-trunks for on going work on 1.0-RC4 to come.
If you have any problem with one of those two bran
--On Tuesday, August 01, 2006 3:21 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:16 AM +0300 Ersin Er
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
https://opends.dev.java.net/
And this would be better than FDS how?! :P
Oh, this is all in java, not based off
Hi Niklas,
thank you very much for your help!!! Here is my modified and optimized
config part:
class="org.apache.mina.transport.socket.nio.SocketAcceptor"/>
factory-method="getDefaultConfig">
factory-method="getSessionConfig">
class="org.apache.mina.
--On Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:16 AM +0300 Ersin Er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
https://opends.dev.java.net/
And this would be better than FDS how?! :P
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: htt
https://opends.dev.java.net/
:-)
--
Ersin
I`m going to check in a HTTP server example using MINA but I don`t see
where to attach the code after creating the JIRA issue. Can anybody
tell me where to look. Sorry I`m not seeing it.
John
On 7/3/06, peter royal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 1, 2006, at 5:44 PM, John Preston wrote:
> Ok,
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Alex Karasulu a écrit :
>
>> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>
>>> repositories are moving, plugins are moving, and this could break
>>> everything.
>>
>>
>> I share your frustration.
>
> It's not a frustration. It's a fear...
>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> - I want to build version X
On Aug 1, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Niklas Therning wrote:
Do we really have to call acquire on ByteBuffers created using wrap?
AFAICS they won't be pooled by default.
no, you don't.
-pete
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-234?page=all ]
Oleg Kalnichevski updated DIRMINA-234:
--
Attachment: mina-httpcore-httpserver.tar.gz
Just for the record, this code uses publicly available HttpCore release
4.0-alpha2 and is not fully co
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-229?page=all ]
Oleg Kalnichevski closed DIRMINA-229.
-
That fixed the problem for me. Thanks a bunch
Oleg
> IoSessionOutputStream write methods should not return before the I/O
> operation is fully complet
Simple HTTP server based on Jakarta HttpComponents Core and MINA
Key: DIRMINA-234
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-234
Project: Directory MINA
Issue Type: New
Do we really have to call acquire on ByteBuffers created using wrap?
AFAICS they won't be pooled by default.
--
Niklas Therning
Software Architect
www.spamdrain.net
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-229?page=all ]
Niklas Therning updated DIRMINA-229:
Fix Version/s: 0.9.5
> IoSessionOutputStream write methods should not return before the I/O
> operation is fully completed
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-229?page=all ]
Niklas Therning resolved DIRMINA-229.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I've made the changes as suggested by Oleg. I've also readded the code which
joins on the CloseFuture in IoSessionOutputStream.clo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-229?page=all ]
Niklas Therning reassigned DIRMINA-229:
---
Assignee: Niklas Therning
> IoSessionOutputStream write methods should not return before the I/O
> operation is fully completed
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-232?page=all ]
Oleg Kalnichevski closed DIRMINA-232.
-
> Performance of StreamIoHandler degrades dramatically when the IoSession is
> kept alive between HTTP requests
> --
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-232?page=all ]
Niklas Therning resolved DIRMINA-232.
-
Resolution: Invalid
This is due to tcpNoDelay not being true by default. Oleg, please close this
issue.
> Performance of StreamIoHandler degrades d
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-232?page=comments#action_12424953
]
Niklas Therning commented on DIRMINA-232:
-
Emmanuel suggested that the poor performance might be due to nagle which I
indeed think is the case. Here's th
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-232?page=comments#action_12424952
]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on DIRMINA-232:
---
Please close this one as invalid. I was not aware of that fact that
setTcpNoDelay was not set to true per
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 19:44 +0200, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Guys, seems to me that the Naggle Algorithm hit again :)
>
> When you reach around 25 req/s, whith an average of 40 ms per request means
> you didn't disabled it. Try to change that :
>
> SocketAcceptorConfig acceptorCfg = new SocketAc
Guys, seems to me that the Naggle Algorithm hit again :)
When you reach around 25 req/s, whith an average of 40 ms per request means
you didn't disabled it. Try to change that :
SocketAcceptorConfig acceptorCfg = new SocketAcceptorConfig();
...
((SocketSessionConfig)(acceptorCfg.getSessionConfig
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-229?page=comments#action_12424945
]
Niklas Therning commented on DIRMINA-229:
-
I think this problem is very bad since things could get very, very messed up if
you wrap one of these stream i
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-232?page=comments#action_12424943
]
Niklas Therning commented on DIRMINA-232:
-
Hehe, just figured that out. Thanks! I see performance in line with what you
get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ab2 -k
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-232?page=comments#action_12424939
]
Oleg Kalnichevski commented on DIRMINA-232:
---
Niklas,
Most likely you need to apply this patch first
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-229
O
Are these kind of errors because of overwrites during optimization
branch merge ?
--
Ersin
Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-689?page=all ]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSERVER-689.
-
Resolution:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-688?page=comments#action_12424853
]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot commented on DIRSERVER-688:
--
I closed this issue too quickly... I saw that the file was updated but didn't
check its co
I was looking into writing an FTP server using MINA. I found code in the
Apache incubator that I was going to use, but not sure if there are any
logistical issues that may come back to bite me if I use code in the
incubator. The FTP Server code seems to have good command handling and all,
so I t
Anish Ephrem wrote:
Resending.. previous mail bounced.
Anish
-- Forwarded message --
Hi!
I am using the Apache Directory Server (RC3). I have created sample
users in a domain of objectClass /inetOrgPerson/ and executed a couple
of queries and the following query has a prob
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-689?page=all ]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSERVER-689.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied.
Thanks fo the report !
> Missing field "LOOKUP_EXCLUDING_OPR_ATTRS_BYPASS" in PartitionNexusProxy
>
Excuse me folks for not pointing this out earlier.
Please sign and fax an ICLA to the secretary if you have not already
done so. Here's where you can find this document:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
In addition you may need a CCLA faxed as well ...
"For a corporation that has ass
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-688?page=all ]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot closed DIRSERVER-688.
You're welcome.
I'm happy to help you out.
Closing the issue.
> Incorrect paths to libraries in Manifest.MF of the server-tools project
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-691?page=all ]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSERVER-691.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Ok, patched applied.
Thanks !
> Wrong DN comparison in SimpleTriggerExecutionAuthorizer
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-690?page=comments#action_12424826
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-690:
-
MINA version is 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT.
I guess that a newer version will appear sooner or later, but when ?
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-690?page=all ]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSERVER-690.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied.
Thanks PAM !
> Wrong access to ThreadPool in ServerContextFactory
>
Hi,there is currently a bug in Apacheds which forbid you to use such requests. It has been fixed, and a new version will be released in the next few weeks.If you are in a hurry, then the trukn will be the way to go, but it's not currently updated (we are working on it atm)
EmmanuelOn 8/1/06, Anish
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-690?page=comments#action_12424820
]
Jörg Henne commented on DIRSERVER-690:
--
This is for MINA 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, right? Is there a release scheduled for 0.9.5?
0.9.5. will be needed for proper D
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-691?page=all ]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot updated DIRSERVER-691:
-
Attachment: patch-SimpleTriggerExecutionAuthorizer.patch
Here's a patch for this issue.
It must be applied from :
/apacheds/core/
Resending.. previous mail bounced.
Anish-- Forwarded message --
Hi!
I am using the Apache Directory Server (RC3). I have created sample users in a domain of objectClass inetOrgPerson and executed a couple of queries and the following query has a problem!
(&((objectClass=inetO
Wrong DN comparison in SimpleTriggerExecutionAuthorizer
---
Key: DIRSERVER-691
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-691
Project: Directory ApacheDS
Issue Type: Bug
Affect
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-690?page=all ]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot updated DIRSERVER-690:
-
Attachment: patch-apacheds-server-jndi.patch
Here's a patch for this issue.
It must be applied from : /apacheds/server-jndi
> Wro
Wrong access to ThreadPool in ServerContextFactory
--
Key: DIRSERVER-690
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-690
Project: Directory ApacheDS
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-689?page=all ]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot updated DIRSERVER-689:
-
Attachment: patch-PartitionNexusProxy.patch
Here is a patch for this issue.
It must applied from
/apacheds/core/src/main/java/org
Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb:
Jörg,
we have to merge all the modification done in optimization-trunks into
1.0-trunk. It will be done really soon now.
I will keep you inform.
If you want the latest version, just check out
branches/1.0/optimization-trunks right now.
Unfortunately, I ran into
Missing field "LOOKUP_EXCLUDING_OPR_ATTRS_BYPASS" in PartitionNexusProxy
Key: DIRSERVER-689
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-689
Project: Directory ApacheDS
46 matches
Mail list logo