Re: searching whole subtree

2007-03-01 Thread marek-apacheds
Alex After your fix it works fine now. Thank you for your time and effort. Regards Marek - Original Message - From: Alex Karasulu To: Apache Directory Developers List Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 8:10 PM Subject: Re: searching whole subtree Marek, I found this bug y

[jira] Commented: (DIRSERVER-861) Apache DS 1.0.1 depends on Java 1.5.0

2007-03-01 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477192 ] Gary Gregory commented on DIRSERVER-861: Guilty party is class {{AttributeTypeAndValue in directory/share

Re: [SASL] SASL questions

2007-03-01 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, March 01, 2007 4:24 PM -0800 Enrique Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Directory developers, I have time this weekend so I'm looking at adding SASL\GSSAPI\Kerberos V5 to LDAP binds. After reading some RFCs and ApacheDS internals, I have a couple questions: 1) The Au

[SASL] SASL questions

2007-03-01 Thread Enrique Rodriguez
Hi, Directory developers, I have time this weekend so I'm looking at adding SASL\GSSAPI\Kerberos V5 to LDAP binds. After reading some RFCs and ApacheDS internals, I have a couple questions: 1) The Authenticator.authenticate() method requires an LdapDN. GSSAPI returns a Kerberos principal name.

Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP

2007-03-01 Thread Enrique Rodriguez
On 3/1/07, Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) I'd really like to see interested individuals work on the LDAP schema in the IETF. The effort has floundered for lack of people driving it. 2) I'd really love to see an ldap plugin that used some schema and called kadm5_* interfaces--I.E.

Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP

2007-03-01 Thread Alex Karasulu
I think we could easily achieve #2 with ApacheDS using an interceptor. Alex On 3/1/07, Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) I'd really like to see interested individuals work on the LDAP schema in the IETF. The effort has floundered for lack of people driving it. 2) I'd really love to se

Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP

2007-03-01 Thread Sam Hartman
1) I'd really like to see interested individuals work on the LDAP schema in the IETF. The effort has floundered for lack of people driving it. 2) I'd really love to see an ldap plugin that used some schema and called kadm5_* interfaces--I.E. a way to replace kadmind with openldap even in si

Re: searching whole subtree

2007-03-01 Thread Alex Karasulu
Marek, I found this bug you speak about and fixed it as well. I was wrong in that it was still there after my initial fixes. I apologize for this. Hopefully we can fix anything else that you find wrong with ApacheDS quickly. Here are the change logs for the fix in both 1.0 and 1.5 branches re

Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP

2007-03-01 Thread Alex Karasulu
+1 to that! On 3/1/07, Quanah Gibson-Mount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On Thursday, March 01, 2007 12:09 AM -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Feb 28, 1:21pm, "Apache Directory Developers List" wrote: > } Subject: Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP > > Good evening to everyone. > >> --On

Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP

2007-03-01 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On Thursday, March 01, 2007 12:09 AM -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 28, 1:21pm, "Apache Directory Developers List" wrote: } Subject: Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP Good evening to everyone. --On Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:34 PM -0800 Enrique Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP

2007-03-01 Thread Alex Karasulu
Hi Greg, On 3/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 28, 1:21pm, "Apache Directory Developers List" wrote: } Subject: Re: [Kerberos] Kerberos + OpenLDAP Good evening to everyone. Good morning to you. --On Tuesday, February 27, 2007 6:34 PM -0800 Enrique Rodriguez > <[E

Re: searching whole subtree

2007-03-01 Thread Alex Karasulu
Marek, What version of ADS is this? And btw I think my fix in the 1.0 branch fixes this for 1.0.2. You might want to try building and using that for now and report back what problems you're having. Thanks, Alex On 3/1/07, marek-apacheds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi When I execute the foll

[jira] Created: (DIRSTUDIO-64) Unable to modify an Attribute Type's OID

2007-03-01 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (JIRA)
Unable to modify an Attribute Type's OID Key: DIRSTUDIO-64 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-64 Project: Directory LDAP Studio Issue Type: Bug Components: ldapstudio-schem

[jira] Closed: (DIRSTUDIO-51) Add a way to get the OC which use an AT

2007-03-01 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot closed DIRSTUDIO-51. --- Closed. > Add a way to get the OC which use an AT > --

[jira] Resolved: (DIRSTUDIO-51) Add a way to get the OC which use an AT

2007-03-01 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot resolved DIRSTUDIO-51. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed at revision 513392. http://svn.apache.org/view

searching whole subtree

2007-03-01 Thread marek-apacheds
Hi When I execute the following query with default scope (ONELEVEL_SCOPE) SearchControls controls = new SearchControls(); ctx.search("", "(!(title=Marek))", controls); everything works fine. But when I change scope to SUBTREE_SCOPE I got an exception. SearchControls controls = new SearchContr