Hi Emmanuel,
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
...
As soon as you consider that a delete operation will need to update all the
index the deleted entry uses, you see that you can benefit from having such
reverse index : you don't have to grab the entry
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Keheliya Gallaba updated DIRSTUDIO-654:
---
Attachment: DIRSTUDIO-654-1.patch
Patch added.
from schema label extracted for
On 5/13/10 8:08 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.comwrote:
...
As soon as you consider that a delete operation will need to update all the
index the deleted entry uses, you see that you can benefit from having such
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi guys,
snip
So here is what I suggest :
- get rid of those reverse index
- or, at least, make it optionnal
thoughts ?
You described pure attribute value indices (including system indices
like objectClass and entryUUID as well as user indices like cn or uid).
Emmanuel Lécharny schrieb:
On 5/13/10 8:08 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Emmanuel
Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.comwrote:
...
As soon as you consider that a delete operation will need to update
all the
index the deleted entry uses, you see that you
On 5/13/10 11:10 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Emmanuel Lécharny schrieb:
Well, not anymore :)
They are still used. In fact there are more reverse methods in Index
class:
Damnit ! When I copy/past those method's name from the mail, and search
them, I found nothing.
It seems that
Hi
I'd like to fix the various issues we have with alias handling [1]-[4].
Right now we are using indices for alias handling. When using indices it
is essential that they are of integrity. It is important that the target
of an alias entry (referenced by aliasedObjectName) exists. We check
this
Some elements of response :
- there is a RFC draft (an old one) describing how Alias should behave :
http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/OpenLDAP/OpenLDAP-15/OpenLDAP/doc/drafts/draft-byrne-ldap-alias-xx.txt
(so far still a draft)
- Alias is described in section 2.6 of RFC 4512
- If an
Hi guys,
we are heavily depending on JDBM, at a point we had to fork it. It's
right now a module in ADS.
However, now that we are heavily refactoring the JDBM code, we may want
to move the project in a separate place, so that we can point on a
stable version instead of having a moving
