-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
He says "The runners provided on this article demonstrates how to use a
custom RunnerScheduler, but can be safely used in any projects and be
modified according to your needs." (http://junit.org/node/589), so there
should be no problem adding the Apach
On 6/8/10 9:22 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
He says "The runners provided on this article demonstrates how to use a
custom RunnerScheduler, but can be safely used in any projects and be
modified according to your needs." (http://junit.org/node/589), so th
On 6/8/10 9:22 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
He says "The runners provided on this article demonstrates how to use a
custom RunnerScheduler, but can be safely used in any projects and be
modified according to your needs." (http://junit.org/node/589), so th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/08/10 09:30, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 6/8/10 9:22 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> He says "The runners provided on this article demonstrates how to use a
>> custom RunnerScheduler, but can be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/08/10 09:39, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 6/8/10 9:22 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> He says "The runners provided on this article demonstrates how to use a
>> custom RunnerScheduler, but can be
I know Chris Custine has done some work a while back, just wondering is
there was any interest in using Karaf for the base runtime ? If so, i'd be
happy to help in any way. I certainly don't want to push Karaf at all
costs, just proposing / checking ... so I would not be offended if the
answer is
On 6/8/10 10:37 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/08/10 09:30, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 6/8/10 9:22 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
He says "The runners provided on this article demonstrates how to us
On 6/8/10 10:59 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I know Chris Custine has done some work a while back, just wondering is
there was any interest in using Karaf for the base runtime ? If so, i'd be
happy to help in any way. I certainly don't want to push Karaf at all
costs, just proposing / checking ..
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 6/8/10 10:59 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I know Chris Custine has done some work a while back, just wondering is
>> there was any interest in using Karaf for the base runtime ? If so, i'd
>> be
>> happy to help in any way. I cert
I don't have much knowledge of DS really, but in order to make things run
smoothly in OSGi, the first step is obviously to turn those into OSGi
bundles.
Karaf comes later if you want to use it as your runtime container instead of
using your own org.apache.directory.server.UberjarMain + everything t
On 6/8/10 2:51 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I don't have much knowledge of DS really, but in order to make things run
smoothly in OSGi, the first step is obviously to turn those into OSGi
bundles.
Karaf comes later if you want to use it as your runtime container instead of
using your own org.apache
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I don't have much knowledge of DS really, but in order to make things
> run smoothly in OSGi, the first step is obviously to turn those into
> OSGi bundles.
> Karaf comes later if you want to use it as your runtime container
> instead of using your own org.apache.directory.
Numbered attributes not showing up in TRUE numerical order; should be at least
an option.
-
Key: DIRSTUDIO-662
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-662
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 18:07, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 6/8/10 2:51 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> I don't have much knowledge of DS really, but in order to make things run
>> smoothly in OSGi, the first step is obviously to turn those into OSGi
>> bundles.
>> Karaf comes later if you want t
14 matches
Mail list logo
