On 12/23/10 3:42 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
On 12/22/10 1:15 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
I think I already sent a mail a few weeks ago about this matter.
The RFC-3671 stipulates that for collectiveAttributes we have to add
the collectiveAttributeSubentries AT in the entry to indicat
Hi,
I have an issue. When trying to update the seqNumber attribute in an
AdminsitrativePoint, I get an error :
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.exception.LdapNoPermissionException:
ERR_52 Cannot modify the attribute : ATTRIBUTE_TYPE (
1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.0.4.1.2.51
NAME 'APSeqNumber'
DESC A s
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an issue. When trying to update the seqNumber attribute in an
> AdminsitrativePoint, I get an error :
> org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.exception.LdapNoPermissionException: ERR_52
> Cannot modify the attribut
On 12/23/10 3:10 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
Hi,
I have an issue. When trying to update the seqNumber attribute in an
AdminsitrativePoint, I get an error :
org.apache.directory.shared.ldap.exception.LdapNoPermissionExceptio
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I already sent a mail a few weeks ago about this matter.
>
> The RFC-3671 stipulates that for collectiveAttributes we have to add the
> collectiveAttributeSubentries AT in the entry to indicate the subentries
> which have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Seelmann resolved DIR-267.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Done
> Project Naming And Descriptions
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Seelmann resolved DIR-265.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Stefan Seelmann (was: Alex Karasulu)
All done.
There is no DOAP
Hi,
I am proud to announce stable release of JDBM2. It is 1.0 fork which
adds lot of stuff, most notably:
* java.util.Map view to indexes
* soft cache
* secondary map (aka foreign indexes in SQL)
* better speed
* defragmentation
* more space efficient
* under Apache 2 license.
However it d
On 12/23/10 11:30 PM, Jan Kotek wrote:
Hi,
I am proud to announce stable release of JDBM2. It is 1.0 fork which
adds lot of stuff, most notably:
* java.util.Map view to indexes
* soft cache
* secondary map (aka foreign indexes in SQL)
* better speed
* defragmentation
* more space eff
Hi,
> Yeah, at this point, we need something like MVCC implemented in JDBM 3.0
I am afraid I dont have plans for MVCC in JDBM.
Having single transaction greatly reduces complexity and I dont really
need it in my desktop app.
JK
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 12/
10 matches
Mail list logo