+1 - have not checked the release though
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
p...@marcelot.netwrote:
Hi guys,
I've managed to fix the bugs that prevented the release (obscure things
needed to be configured for this to work).
This release fixes a minor bug:
-
[X] +1 | Release Apache Directory Studio Maven Plugin 1.0.5
Documentation looks good now, thanks for fixing it.
Regards
Felix
Hi,
I have added txns support in LdapCoreSessionConnection, but I have some
issues with searches : the txn has to remain opened until the cursor is
closed. That means the cursor must retain the txns and that the commit
is done in the cursor.close() operation.
I think we can use the inner
Hi,
if we want to make the search operation part of the transaction, then we
may need to move the Txnmanager to the shared-ldap library, as we don't
see this class from any cursor.
The need is to be able to commit or rollback the txn when the
cursor.close() is done (or if we've got an
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
if we want to make the search operation part of the transaction, then we
may need to move the Txnmanager to the shared-ldap library, as we don't see
this class from any cursor.
I see what you mean. But there
I am saying this because clearly TxnManager does not belong in shared if we
just step back and think about it. Yes the mechanics of the code is making
us consider this but we should resist and see what we can do with some
pattern to decouple this.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Alex Karasulu
Hi Alex,
I just discussed this with Emmanuel, and like you, I think the transaction does
not belong in shared.
It's really meant to be placed between the piece of code which captures LDAP
requests on the server and the various partition back-end implementations.
I haven't looked at the code
Hi guys,
Today, I have introduced a change in the Connection Core plugin of Apache
Directory Studio to set the 'Apache Directory LDAP API' as the default network
provider, instead of JNDI.
I think it's safe to say that the LDAP API is now a great alternative to JNDI.
It might still lack a few
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
p...@marcelot.net wrote:
Hi guys,
Today, I have introduced a change in the Connection Core plugin of Apache
Directory Studio to set the 'Apache Directory LDAP API' as the default
network provider, instead of JNDI.
I think it's safe
Hi (again) guys,
As you might have noticed, I took some time last week to go on a JIRA fixing
campaign on Apache Directory Studio.
With the recent developments, I think we are nearing a possible release of a
first milestone for version 2.0.
Of course, it still needs some work but various
On 12/20/11 6:04 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I have added txns support in LdapCoreSessionConnection, but I have some
issues with searches : the txn has to remain opened until the cursor is
closed. That means the
On 12/20/11 7:09 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
Hi (again) guys,
As you might have noticed, I took some time last week to go on a JIRA fixing
campaign on Apache Directory Studio.
With the recent developments, I think we are nearing a possible release of a
first milestone for version 2.0.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
p...@marcelot.netwrote:
Hi Alex,
I just discussed this with Emmanuel, and like you, I think the transaction
does not belong in shared.
It's really meant to be placed between the piece of code which captures
LDAP requests on the server
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Kiran Ayyagari kayyag...@apache.orgwrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
p...@marcelot.net wrote:
Hi guys,
Today, I have introduced a change in the Connection Core plugin of
Apache Directory Studio to set the 'Apache Directory
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/20/11 7:09 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
Hi (again) guys,
As you might have noticed, I took some time last week to go on a JIRA
fixing campaign on Apache Directory Studio.
With the recent developments,
Hi,
I tried to get some tests passing where a recursive delete is done. The
problem is that we do a search at each level, whch means we start a new
transaction at each new level.
I can easily check that a transaction has not been started yet (so that
the txn is only started once), but as I
Since you cannot use triggers right now, I am assuming you are trying
to do the recursive delete thorugh ldap core connection?
As I tried to explain in my previous emails, the first thing to decide
is to where to put the transaction boundaries:
* For Ldap requests over the wite, ldap protocol
17 matches
Mail list logo
