Le 12/11/12 2:09 PM, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 12/11/12 11:02 AM, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
But, and there is a big but, when
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Le 12/11/12 2:09 PM, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 12/11/12 11:02 AM, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:23 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13530976#comment-13530976
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-1776:
--
Studio works well, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13530979#comment-13530979
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-1776:
--
Never mind, I can confirm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13531003#comment-13531003
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-1776:
--
Ok, the 'photo' attribute
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13531007#comment-13531007
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-1776:
--
Clearly a bug : the photo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSERVER-1776.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-M9
Fixed with
Thank you for responding to my query so quickly! Changing "organization" to "domain" produced exactly the results I was looking for!
Hi guys,
just to inform you that I'm done with the cleanup of the lookup operation.
The last commit [1] exposes the change smade. othing really serious,
except a change in teh Store API : the previously named lookup( Sring[,
Dn]) method is now named fetch(), to avoid any confusion with the
Hi guys,
after havng done some cleanup for the Lookup and Search operation, I'm
looking at the List operation, and I wonder if we should not just get
rid of it, except on the JNDO layer ?
The List operation is just a special form of teh Search operation, with
ONE_LEVEL scope and a
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
after havng done some cleanup for the Lookup and Search operation, I'm
looking at the List operation, and I wonder if we should not just get
rid of it, except on the JNDO layer ?
The List operation is
+1 too
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
Le 14 déc. 2012 à 08:39, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi guys,
after havng done some cleanup for the Lookup and Search operation, I'm
looking at the List operation, and I wonder if we should not just get
rid of it, except on the JNDO layer ?
Le 13 déc. 2012 à 23:57, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi guys,
just to inform you that I'm done with the cleanup of the lookup operation.
The last commit [1] exposes the change smade. othing really serious,
except a change in teh Store API : the previously named lookup(
13 matches
Mail list logo
