Re: Testing ApacheDS installers

2015-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 04/01/15 08:01, Emmanuel Lécharny a écrit : Hi guys, a quick update. The following installers have been tested, and the doco updated : - debian (http://directory.staging.apache.org/apacheds/advanced-ug/2.2.1-debian-instance-layout.html) - archive

Re: Testing ApacheDS installers

2015-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 05/01/15 08:41, Pierre Smits a écrit : When trying to run the installer for Windows 8 I get a removal of the downloaded snapshot (ApacheDS-2.0.0-M20-SNAPSHOT.EXE) after I downloaded it.This is due to following issue:

Re: Result was : Re: [Vote] Accept Kai Zheng contribution (Haox) as a sub-project

2015-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 04/01/15 16:23, Shawn McKinney a écrit : On 01/04/2015 03:28 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: I believe hey are names for a different application area than Authentication, Authorization and Security. +1 to that notion. On 01/04/2015 03:28 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: And that is playing field we

Re: Testing ApacheDS installers

2015-01-05 Thread Pierre Smits
That is what you get when using their product rarely (like in my case). Thanks for the heads up. Will try again. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad Op 5 jan. 2015 om 10:50 heeft Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com het volgende geschreven: Le 05/01/15 08:41, Pierre Smits a écrit : When trying to

Re: Testing ApacheDS installers

2015-01-05 Thread Pierre Smits
I just completed the installation of the ApacheDS-2.0.0-M20-SNAPSHOT.exe on a Windows 8 machine with JAVA JDK 1.7u71. The installation was successful. However, starting the snapshot resulted in an error 1067. Which I am clueless about. Regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*

Re: Testing ApacheDS installers

2015-01-05 Thread Pierre Smits
Well, it turned out that the reference to java was wrong. After having set it to the correct path it went smoothly. When looking at wrapper.log I noticed: INFO | jvm 1| 2015/01/05 12:28:36 | WARNING - Unable to load the Wrapper's native library 'wrapper.dll'. INFO | jvm 1| 2015/01/05

Re: Result was : Re: [Vote] Accept Kai Zheng contribution (Haox) as a sub-project

2015-01-05 Thread Shawn McKinney
On 01/05/2015 05:13 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: You will not get any help from the ASF when ir comes to pick a name... As it is virtually impossible to check in all the regions if the name is already taken : we simply don't have the money/time/expertise to do that. As I'm sure everyone here

Re: Result was : Re: [Vote] Accept Kai Zheng contribution (Haox) as a sub-project

2015-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 05/01/15 11:47, Pierre Smits a écrit : It all has to do with the perception we want to create and instil. The ASF has brand power. The product can and should leverage that, but should also strengthen it. And we have to consider the trade mark issue. While some names might be easily

Re: Result was : Re: [Vote] Accept Kai Zheng contribution (Haox) as a sub-project

2015-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 05/01/15 12:48, Shawn McKinney a écrit : On 01/05/2015 05:13 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: You will not get any help from the ASF when ir comes to pick a name... As it is virtually impossible to check in all the regions if the name is already taken : we simply don't have the

Re: Ldap pool issue...

2015-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Some insights : This is not a thread issue. I'm able to reproduce the pb with only one thread pounding the server with new connection requests (ie, it gets a connection, and move it back to the pool as soon as the search is done, and the pool just close the connection). Here is what I get :

Re: Result was : Re: [Vote] Accept Kai Zheng contribution (Haox) as a sub-project

2015-01-05 Thread Pierre Smits
Indeed. For sure, all the 'good' names are already taken. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com

Re: svn commit: r1649544 - /directory/apacheds/trunk/pom.xml

2015-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 05/01/15 16:15, cohei...@apache.org a écrit : Author: coheigea Date: Mon Jan 5 15:15:55 2015 New Revision: 1649544 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1649544 Log: Updating some dependencies Thanks for that, Colm. I'm extending those changes to the other projects. One more thing I'm

Re: [Kerberos] Finding a new name for the new project

2015-01-05 Thread Stefan Seelmann
On 01/05/2015 04:14 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: - Fluffy Kerby and flylly sounds like pet projects, not the message we want to convey. I agree, suggesting such a funny name wasn't very clever from my side. Kerberos had siblings : Orthrus, Echidna and Typhon. Orthrus and his master,

Re: [Kerberos] Finding a new name for the new project

2015-01-05 Thread Pierre Smits
As Kerberos is (loosel) based on Cerberus ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerberus) we might consider: Geyron or Geyrone see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geryon Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com* Services Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and

Re: svn commit: r1649544 - /directory/apacheds/trunk/pom.xml

2015-01-05 Thread Stefan Seelmann
On 01/05/2015 04:15 PM, cohei...@apache.org wrote: -pax-exam.version3.5.0/pax-exam.version -pax-url.version2.2.0/pax-url.version +pax-exam.version4.4.0/pax-exam.version +pax-url.version2.3.0/pax-url.version When using pax-exam 4.4.0 we need to set compiler level of our

Re: [Kerberos] Finding a new name for the new project

2015-01-05 Thread Felix Knecht
What about: Argos ? Sorry, but I could only find the a German wikipedia entry: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argos_(Riese) On 01/05/2015 04:14 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: Hi guys, I created a new thread dedicated to this task, no need to polute one which is not related. So we currently

[Kerberos] Finding a new name for the new project

2015-01-05 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Hi guys, I created a new thread dedicated to this task, no need to polute one which is not related. So we currently have discarded Apache Kerberos as a valid name, for IP reasons. The current proposed names are : - Haox - Kerby - Fluffy The first one is ok except that it's easy to confuse it