Le 10/01/15 13:37, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Zheng, Kai kai.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Ah, OK. Yes it would be great if the permission issue works for me. I’m
really a little upset because all the tasks I just created were all
assigned to Emmanuel automatically. I
Sure no problem. Let me sort all the related tasks out according to our related
discussion and create the JIRAs for them to avoid we missing them. When the
permission is fixed for me, I would assign appropriately. There’re also some
contributors from Hadoop space that would help with them.
Pierre Smits created DIRKRB-109:
---
Summary: We need a logo for the subproject
Key: DIRKRB-109
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-109
Project: Directory Kerberos
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14272493#comment-14272493
]
Kai Zheng commented on DIRKRB-103:
--
It was just done.
commit
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Zheng, Kai kai.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Looks like I can't assign the issue to me. Does it matter? I'm OK with
this, just want to confirm it's going in the right way. In Hadoop related
projects, contributors can assign JIRAs to themselves, which indicate they
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14272474#comment-14272474
]
Kai Zheng commented on DIRKRB-102:
--
The GIT repo was created:
Kai Zheng created DIRKRB-108:
Summary: Building the web site
Key: DIRKRB-108
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-108
Project: Directory Kerberos
Issue Type: Sub-task
built the tag, tested on windows with java 1.7, ran ldap-client-tests from
the -M19 tag (with pom updated to point to -M28) all successful
+1
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Shawn McKinney smckin...@apache.org
wrote:
re-Built the tag (with updates) on ubuntu 13.04 with java 1.7. Also
Congratulations, Kai!
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi !
we are pleased to
Looks like I can't assign the issue to me. Does it matter? I'm OK with this,
just want to confirm it's going in the right way. In Hadoop related projects,
contributors can assign JIRAs to themselves, which indicate they would work on
them.
Regards,
Kai
-Original Message-
From: Kai
Kai Zheng created DIRKRB-105:
Summary: Adding the missing Javadoc
Key: DIRKRB-105
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-105
Project: Directory Kerberos
Issue Type: Sub-task
Ah, OK. Yes it would be great if the permission issue works for me. I’m really
a little upset because all the tasks I just created were all assigned to
Emmanuel automatically. I don’t think Emmanuel would love all of them. ☺
Thanks for the clarifying.
Regards,
Kai
From: Kiran Ayyagari
Kai Zheng created DIRKRB-102:
Summary: A dedicated Kerberos sub project
Key: DIRKRB-102
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-102
Project: Directory Kerberos
Issue Type: New Feature
Le 10/01/15 13:47, Zheng, Kai a écrit :
Sure no problem. Let me sort all the related tasks out according to our
related discussion and create the JIRAs for them to avoid we missing them.
Good !
When the permission is fixed for me, I would assign appropriately.
We don't really care too
Kai Zheng created DIRKRB-107:
Summary: Adding the documentation
Key: DIRKRB-107
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-107
Project: Directory Kerberos
Issue Type: Sub-task
Le 10/01/15 11:53, dran...@apache.org a écrit :
Repository: directory-kerberos
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master [created] 449a21a7b
A test
It does work !
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:53 PM, dran...@apache.org wrote:
Repository: directory-kerberos
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/master [created] 449a21a7b
A test
and a warm welcome Kai !
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/directory-kerberos/repo
Commit:
Kai Zheng created DIRKRB-106:
Summary: Adding more tests
Key: DIRKRB-106
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-106
Project: Directory Kerberos
Issue Type: Sub-task
We don't really care too much about assignment of issues.
OK no problem. If you don't care it, I won't either.
Then I think they should attach patches, and eventually be voted committers.
Sure, that's what I meant. I'm sure they understand the approach, as they
followed in the Hadoop space.
Kai Zheng created DIRKRB-110:
Summary: Review and refine the IdentityService/Backend API for KDC
Key: DIRKRB-110
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-110
Project: Directory Kerberos
On 01/10/2015 11:36 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi !
we are pleased to welcome Kai Zheng as a new committer of the Apache
Directory Project !
Thanks !
Welcome Kai :)
Hi !
we are pleased to welcome Kai Zheng as a new committer of the Apache
Directory Project !
Thanks !
Kai Zheng created DIRKRB-104:
Summary: Clean up and clear the codes, clarifying any IP concerned
codes
Key: DIRKRB-104
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-104
Project: Directory Kerberos
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Zheng, Kai kai.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Ah, OK. Yes it would be great if the permission issue works for me. I’m
really a little upset because all the tasks I just created were all
assigned to Emmanuel automatically. I don’t think Emmanuel would love all
of
re-Built the tag (with updates) on ubuntu 13.04 with java 1.7. Also re-tested
with fortress-core head.
+1 (non-binding)
On 01/09/2015 08:31 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the 28th milestone of the 1.0.0 LDAP API/Shared,
1.0.0-M28.
This is mainly a bug fix
I' ll try that. Before doing a sudo rm -rf / in the last resort :-)
Le samedi 10 janvier 2015, Stefan Seelmann m...@stefan-seelmann.de a
écrit :
Hi Emmanuel,
you know, OSGi and Snapshots are no good friends...
Both Tycho and Eclipse cache artifacts in various places, based on the
artifact
Hi all,
I wonder if we should remove the old ApacheDS 1.5.x server and
configruation plugins in Studio?
If users ask for support for 1.5.x ApacheDS version we suggest them to
move to the latest 2.0 milestone.
Currently Studio is shipped with five ApacheDS versions (1.5.3...1.5.7),
each requires
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Stefan Seelmann m...@stefan-seelmann.de
wrote:
Hi all,
I wonder if we should remove the old ApacheDS 1.5.x server and
configruation plugins in Studio?
If users ask for support for 1.5.x ApacheDS version we suggest them to
move to the latest 2.0 milestone.
28 matches
Mail list logo
