[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15071373#comment-15071373
]
Jiajia Li commented on DIRKRB-511:
--
V2 looks great to me, I will commit it, thanks Yan's work and Kai's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jiajia Li resolved DIRKRB-511.
--
Resolution: Fixed
commit d6bf76c135237120cf750a0367013dd5ca21bbd9
Author: plusplusjiajia
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15071397#comment-15071397
]
Kai Zheng commented on DIRKRB-509:
--
Very cool to figure this out!! Note I heard this draft but never saw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15071364#comment-15071364
]
Kai Zheng commented on DIRKRB-509:
--
Good catch Jiajia!! It looks like MIT implementation is kinds of out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15071376#comment-15071376
]
YanYan commented on DIRKRB-511:
---
Thanks Jiajia's commitment, and thanks Kai's reivew - it helped improve a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15071385#comment-15071385
]
Jiajia Li commented on DIRKRB-509:
--
>From MIT KRB DEV: The define is from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15071371#comment-15071371
]
Jiajia Li commented on DIRKRB-509:
--
Not yet, I will report it, thanks.
> Add SupportedKDFs in AuthPack
>
YanYan created DIRKRB-512:
-
Summary: Java building error: Illegal key size
Key: DIRKRB-512
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-512
Project: Directory Kerberos
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15070761#comment-15070761
]
YanYan edited comment on DIRKRB-511 at 12/24/15 8:50 AM:
-
1.{{reload()}} has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
YanYan updated DIRKRB-511:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Sorry for the format;)
It is my first attempt to use advanced formatting.)
> Load
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15070766#comment-15070766
]
Kai Zheng commented on DIRKRB-511:
--
Never mind, but I guess you can edit the comment if you'd like to.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
YanYan updated DIRKRB-511:
--
Attachment: DIRKRB-511-v2.patch
1.{code}reload(){code} has been added.
2.Add *synchronized* to
While before someone may find and complain (I like it actually) about it, I'd
like to mention that Javadoc is another thing we need to complement. I will add
comments and Javadoc in the API and critical places once the code base is
stabilized after some left issues are cleared.
Regards,
Kai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15070764#comment-15070764
]
YanYan commented on DIRKRB-511:
---
Sorry for the format;)
It is my first attempt to use advanced formatting.
The Apache Directory Team is proud to announce the availability of version
1.0.0-M33 of the Apache Directory LDAP API.
The Apache Directory LDAP API is an ongoing effort to provide an enhanced
LDAP API, as a replacement for JNDI and the existing LDAP API (jLdap and
Mozilla LDAP API).
This is a
The Apache Directory team is pleased to announce the release of ApacheDS
2.0.0-M21, the 21th milestone towards a 2.0 version.
ApacheDS is an extensible and embeddable directory server entirely written
in Java, which has been certified LDAPv3 compatible by the Open Group.
Besides LDAP it supports
Nice comments! Let me focus on something to explain.
Regarding merge AbstractAsn1Type and Asn1Encodeable. As I said before, the
former wraps a Java value, the latter does the encoding/decoding dirty work.
The separation may does no good so far, but would also do no hurt for the left.
17 matches
Mail list logo