[jira] [Resolved] (DIRKRB-724) Replace JNDI with LDAP API in LDAP plugin

2018-07-19 Thread Jiajia Li (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRKRB-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jiajia Li resolved DIRKRB-724. -- Resolution: Fixed commit d1055af7e8508e0ad81fadaaf3dd860ab1131ee7 Author: plusplusjiajia Date:  

Result, was : [VOTE] Apache LDAP API 2.0.0-AM1

2018-07-19 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Hi guys, I'm closing this vote a bit earlier than before the 72h delay (actually, 2 hours in advance, because tomorrow I will be off for a week with no computer ;-) We've got 5 binding +1 : Colm, Radovan, Shawn, Stefan and me. I will push the packages, update the site, then do the

[Result][VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.1 release, Take 2

2018-07-19 Thread Shawn McKinney
Calling it with +3 for, Colm, Emmanuel and myself. Stefan’s earlier +1 doesn’t count here (it was on the 1st take), but perhaps provides extra assurances we’re in the good. Thanks for the help, I’ll be finishing up with the needful over the w/e. Shawn > On Jul 18, 2018, at 6:56 AM, Shawn

Re: Pull Requests (or patches) from those without iCLAs

2018-07-19 Thread Moyer, Steven William
Thanks! From: Emmanuel Lécharny Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 9:46:45 AM To: dev@directory.apache.org Subject: Re: Pull Requests (or patches) from those without iCLAs Le 19/07/2018 à 14:54, Moyer, Steven William a écrit : > What are the guidelines for accepting

Re: Pull Requests (or patches) from those without iCLAs

2018-07-19 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 19/07/2018 à 14:54, Moyer, Steven William a écrit : > What are the guidelines for accepting code via PR or patch coming from > individuals without an iCLA? We accept the PR as is, not requesting a iCLA from their authors. "Yes, that opinion comes from me speaking as a board member and

[GitHub] bdemers commented on issue #3: Update project GAV to `org.apache.directory.scim:*:1.0-SNAPSHOT`

2018-07-19 Thread GitBox
bdemers commented on issue #3: Update project GAV to `org.apache.directory.scim:*:1.0-SNAPSHOT` URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-scimple/pull/3#issuecomment-406284072 Works for me, I just picked `1.0` cause that is what was listed on the directory.a.o site. I'll push an update

Pull Requests (or patches) from those without iCLAs

2018-07-19 Thread Moyer, Steven William
What are the guidelines for accepting code via PR or patch coming from individuals without an iCLA?

[GitHub] smoyer64 commented on issue #3: Update project GAV to `org.apache.directory.scim:*:1.0-SNAPSHOT`

2018-07-19 Thread GitBox
smoyer64 commented on issue #3: Update project GAV to `org.apache.directory.scim:*:1.0-SNAPSHOT` URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-scimple/pull/3#issuecomment-406264111 This looks good to me with the exception of perhaps resetting the version to 1.0-SNAPSHOT. This project actually