Awesome!
I assume the maven-bundle-plugin is updated to version 5.1.2? That's
required to build the projects with Java 16 and 17-ea.
On 5/14/21 7:33 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to release apache directory-project 45 in the coming hours if
> no one objects.
>
> I have
Hi,
I'm going to release apache directory-project 45 in the coming hours if
no one objects.
I have tested it with API and Server. (note: the maven surefire plugin
will remain in 3.0.0-M3, the M4 and M5 version are making the tests failing)
It will contain many updated plugin versions:
On 5/14/21 6:23 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> or simpler to release checkstyle-configuration-2.0.1 refering to
> project-44, which should not be such a big deal as we don't have any
> dependencies in the directoy-buildtools projects...
That workaround sounds good to me.
Hi,
while working on a new release of directory-project (45), I found out
that it has a reference on
org.apache.directory.buildtools.checkstyle-configuration, which itself
has a dependences on directory-project:
in directory-project/pom.xml:
...
2.0.1-SNAPSHOT
...
Many thanks, Stefan !
On 13/05/2021 09:42, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Committed and pushed, all issues are resolved, OSGi tests work again.
On 5/13/21 9:20 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
OH, GREAT !
Please commit, I'll check for the missing deps.
On 13/05/2021 08:46, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
I
Shawn McKinney created FC-293:
-
Summary: [fortress-web] CVE-2020-11976
Key: FC-293
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-293
Project: FORTRESS
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17343967#comment-17343967
]
Stefan Seelmann commented on DIRSERVER-2322:
Fix:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-2322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Seelmann reassigned DIRSERVER-2322:
--
Assignee: Stefan Seelmann
> ApacheDS default server instance not starting
seelmann opened a new pull request #49:
URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-server/pull/49
Configure system property `java.io.tmpdir` in the wrapper to point to the
instance layout. Fixes issue when running ApacheDS on Windows because the
original tempdir doesn't exist. Also updated
coheigea merged pull request #48:
URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-server/pull/48
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
Committed and pushed, all issues are resolved, OSGi tests work again.
On 5/13/21 9:20 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> OH, GREAT !
>
> Please commit, I'll check for the missing deps.
>
>
> On 13/05/2021 08:46, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>> I got them to run, but some fail because of unresolved
elecharny commented on pull request #48:
URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-server/pull/48#issuecomment-840373793
I would keep the bulk-loader module atm.
All the others can be removed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
On 13/05/2021 09:02, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
apacheds-core-annotation and apacheds-server-annotation still have
dependencies to junit4 (org.junit.runner package)
This is probably something to remove...
-
To unsubscribe,
OH, GREAT !
Please commit, I'll check for the missing deps.
On 13/05/2021 08:46, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
I got them to run, but some fail because of unresolved requirements. Let
me know if I should commit it and investigate further:
diff --git a/osgi-integ/pom.xml b/osgi-integ/pom.xml
index
coheigea opened a new pull request #48:
URL: https://github.com/apache/directory-server/pull/48
…i, component-hub modules
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
apacheds-core-annotation and apacheds-server-annotation still have
dependencies to junit4 (org.junit.runner package)
On 5/13/21 8:46 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> I got them to run, but some fail because of unresolved requirements. Let
> me know if I should commit it and investigate further:
>
>
I got them to run, but some fail because of unresolved requirements. Let
me know if I should commit it and investigate further:
diff --git a/osgi-integ/pom.xml b/osgi-integ/pom.xml
index f993450965..527b31c51f 100644
--- a/osgi-integ/pom.xml
+++ b/osgi-integ/pom.xml
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@
The weird thing is that there is only one difference between the working
osgi-integ version and the not running one:
org.junit.jupiter
junit-jupiter-engine
test
replaced
junit
junit
test
If I roll back this change, I get the same
18 matches
Mail list logo
