[jira] [Resolved] (FC-297) [fortress-rest] Exclude jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec-1.0.6

2021-07-06 Thread Shawn McKinney (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn McKinney resolved FC-297. --- Resolution: Fixed > [fortress-rest] Exclude jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec-1.0.6 >

[VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release (take 2)

2021-07-06 Thread Shawn McKinney
I have removed (and verified) the jboss jar dependency from fortress rest. The repos are retagged. Artifacts rebuilt and staged once again. Let’s try this again... Hello, This is an announcement to vote for the next release of Apache Directory Fortress, 2.0.6. Here are the list of bugs and

[jira] [Created] (FC-297) [fortress-rest] Exclude jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec-1.0.6

2021-07-06 Thread Shawn McKinney (Jira)
Shawn McKinney created FC-297: - Summary: [fortress-rest] Exclude jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec-1.0.6 Key: FC-297 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FC-297 Project: FORTRESS Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release

2021-07-06 Thread Shawn McKinney
> On Jul 6, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > This is irrelevant. > > Whatever due diligence CXF did, as soon as we know that there is a GPL/LGPL > dependency, we can't cut a release with it in our packages. > > The simple fact it's a transitive dependency is not protecting us

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fortress 2.0.6 release

2021-07-06 Thread Shawn McKinney
> On Jul 5, 2021, at 1:18 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > I found one weird thing: the fortress-rest-2.0.6.war contains in > WEB-INF/lib the jboss-rmi-api_1.0_spec-1.0.6.Final.jar. That jar does not appear on a test machine using JDK 8. Reading the ticket, it’s JDK 11 specific, which is what