yes I think this is a good idea
On 8/28/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> while watching at the 'rat' output pam just sent me, I see that there
> are a bunch of OSGi subprojects we are not using at all.
>
> Question : should we sandbox them ?
>
> wdyt ?
>
> --
> Regar
config reader and creator and just
> start the DS like
> DirectoryService ds = configCreator.createDS(directoryServiceBean);
> ds.startup();
>
> I need not copy the code from startLdap( directoryServiceBean,
> directoryService ) to create the DS and th
config reader and creator and just
> start the DS like
> DirectoryService ds = configCreator.createDS(directoryServiceBean);
> ds.startup();
>
> I need not copy the code from startLdap( directoryServiceBean,
> directoryService ) to create the DS and then start
config reader and creator and just
> start the DS like
> DirectoryService ds = configCreator.createDS(directoryServiceBean);
> ds.startup();
>
> I need not copy the code from startLdap( directoryServiceBean,
> directoryService ) to create the DS and then start
config reader and creator and just
> start the DS like
> DirectoryService ds = configCreator.createDS(directoryServiceBean);
> ds.startup();
>
> I need not copy the code from startLdap( directoryServiceBean,
> directoryService ) to create the DS and then start
config reader and creator and just
> start the DS like
> DirectoryService ds = configCreator.createDS(directoryServiceBean);
> ds.startup();
>
> I need not copy the code from startLdap( directoryServiceBean,
> directoryService ) to create the DS and then start
