Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

Kudos to all participating in this vote and in the realization of this release. Best regards, Pierre Op donderdag 24 maart 2016 heeft Shawn McKinney het volgende geschreven: > I am closing the vote with: > > 3 votes for: > Emmanuel, Stefan, me > > and 1 non-binding vote

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

I am closing the vote with: 3 votes for: Emmanuel, Stefan, me and 1 non-binding vote for: Jiajai Thanks, Shawn > On Mar 20, 2016, at 2:55 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > > Once again we vote to release of Apache Directory Fortress core, realm, rest > and web > >

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

t: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2) Le 24/03/16 09:44, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > Binding +1. > > I haven't got the chance to verify this but would like to trust Stefan and > Jiajia. Please, don't. Trust is good, but verification is mandatory to cast a +1. Be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

Le 24/03/16 09:06, Li, Jiajia a écrit : > +1 Non-binding > > - Build successfully with jdk 1.8.0_40 > - Source package signature and checksum are valid > > > To improve: > Run "mvn apache-rat:check" to check there is no missing license header in > files, > but with one unapproved licenses:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

Le 24/03/16 09:44, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > Binding +1. > > I haven't got the chance to verify this but would like to trust Stefan and > Jiajia. Please, don't. Trust is good, but verification is mandatory to cast a +1. Better vote 0 than casting a +1. Thanks !

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

: Thursday, March 24, 2016 4:07 PM To: Apache Directory Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2) +1 Non-binding - Build successfully with jdk 1.8.0_40 - Source package signature and checksum are valid To improve: Ru

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

. Thanks Jiajia -Original Message- From: Shawn McKinney [mailto:smckin...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 3:56 PM To: Apache Directory Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2) Once again we vote to release of Apache Directory Fortress c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

On 03/22/2016 04:00 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote: >> >> On Mar 21, 2016, at 2:51 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> >> >> PS: Possible mprovements: >> * Update dependencies (e.g. Wicket 6.19->6.22|7.2 or Spring 4.0.0->4.2.5) >> * Automate instructions from quickstart /

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

> > On Mar 21, 2016, at 2:51 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > > PS: Possible mprovements: > * Update dependencies (e.g. Wicket 6.19->6.22|7.2 or Spring 4.0.0->4.2.5) > * Automate instructions from quickstart / ten-minute-guide, e.g. using > Docker The upgrade to Wicket

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

+1 * Checked legal files in source packages * Verified checksums and signatures of source packages * Built from source packages with Java 8 on Linux * Checked legal files in fortress-rest.war and fortress-web.war Kind Regards, Stefan PS: Possible mprovements: * Update dependencies (e.g. Wicket

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

Here are the tests I have run to verify package releases: 1. Apache Fortress & OpenLDAP Quickstart - install and unit test core, realm, rest and web with OpenLDAP: https://github.com/apache/directory-fortress-core/blob/master/README-QUICKSTART-SLAPD.md 2. Apache Fortress 10 Minute Guide -

[Fortress] Legal files cleanup (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42)

On 03/14/2016 09:18 PM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > >> On Mar 14, 2016, at 1:37 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> >> If noone else works on those issues till Wednesday, I can try to fix as >> much as possible till then. > > Go for it Stefan, I won’t be able to work on it before

Re: [Fortress] Legal files cleanup (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42)

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 7:10 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > > Done for fortress-rest, please carefully review. I generally followed > [1] but also got inspiration from Syncope project as they also > distribute a web application with many dependencies. > > * Renamed file

[VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 (Take 2)

Once again we vote to release of Apache Directory Fortress core, realm, rest and web version=1.0-RC42. A temporary tag has been created in git: 1.0-RC42. The staging repo on Nexus: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedirectory-1086/ The source distros:

Re: [Fortress] Legal files cleanup (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42)

> On Mar 19, 2016, at 1:53 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > I also changed fortress-core and fortress-realm. I removed all 3rd party > licenses from lib folders and put the default NOTICE file. > > I think the 3rd party licenses and additional notices are not required >

Re: [Fortress] Legal files cleanup (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42)

On 03/19/2016 07:25 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> Done for fortress-rest, please carefully review. I generally followed >> [1] but also got inspiration from Syncope project as they also >> distribute a web application with many dependencies. >> >> * Renamed file to the bare form (without .txt) as

Re: [Fortress] Legal files cleanup (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42)

> Done for fortress-rest, please carefully review. I generally followed > [1] but also got inspiration from Syncope project as they also > distribute a web application with many dependencies. > > * Renamed file to the bare form (without .txt) as suggested in [1] > > * Source: LICENSE and NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

> On Mar 14, 2016, at 1:37 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > If noone else works on those issues till Wednesday, I can try to fix as > much as possible till then. Go for it Stefan, I won’t be able to work on it before then. Thanks Shawn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

On 03/13/2016 09:14 PM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > >> On Mar 13, 2016, at 6:04 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> >> I have to vote -1. >> >> The blocker is that fortress-rest.war and fortress-web.war don't include >> required licenses and notices. >> * slf4j: permission notice

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

> On Mar 13, 2016, at 6:04 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > I have to vote -1. > > The blocker is that fortress-rest.war and fortress-web.war don't include > required licenses and notices. > * slf4j: permission notice needs to be included in LICENSE file > * accelerator:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

I have to vote -1. The blocker is that fortress-rest.war and fortress-web.war don't include required licenses and notices. * slf4j: permission notice needs to be included in LICENSE file * accelerator: OpenLDAP license needs to be included in LICENSE file * for CDDL licensed software (javaee-api,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

> On Mar 12, 2016, at 9:52 PM, Zheng, Kai wrote: > > I checked the instructions Shawned initiated for the release vote, I have to > say that it's pretty complex or involves much overhead, particularly for me, > a guy that never has the time to absorb the complexity or

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

Developers List <dev@directory.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 > On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The third option that you have not listed : we were extremelly busy > until this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

> On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > The third option that you have not listed : we were extremelly busy > until this week-end. I had to work all days and most of the nights for > the last 4 days, and I just had time to test Kerby in the train. Today

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

Le 12/03/16 12:13, Shawn McKinney a écrit : >> On Mar 9, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote: >> >> The distributions are available for download: >> http://home.apache.org/~smckinney/ >> >> If you are to test, you may follow either one of these README’s, located in >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

is > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Shawn McKinney" <smckin...@apache.org <javascript:;>> > To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org > <javascript:;>> > Cc: fortr...@directory.apache.org <javascript:;&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

inney" <smckin...@apache.org> To: "Apache Directory Developers List" <dev@directory.apache.org> Cc: fortr...@directory.apache.org Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 8:13:21 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42 > On Mar 12, 2016, at 6:48 AM, S

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

> On Mar 12, 2016, at 7:20 AM, Chris Pike wrote: > > I'm new to the process and I think it would help if you provided a basic > overview... Who is allowed vote, how does someone vote, what happens when a > vote is passed, what is expected of someone who votes yes, etc...?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

> On Mar 12, 2016, at 6:48 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > >> >> >> On Mar 12, 2016, at 6:17 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: >> >> Instead I'd like to encourage the Fortress community (Chris, Jan, the >> other Shawn, just to name a few) to test the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

> On Mar 12, 2016, at 6:17 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote: > > > On 03/12/2016 12:13 PM, Shawn McKinney wrote: >> The fact that we’re now 70 hours in w/out a response tells me one of two >> things. Either nobody’s interested, or the test procedures are too hard / >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

Hi Shawn, On 03/12/2016 12:13 PM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > The fact that we’re now 70 hours in w/out a response tells me one of two > things. Either nobody’s interested, or the test procedures are too hard / > confusing. I choose the latter. Just to clarify: the 72 hours vote period are the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

> On Mar 9, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Shawn McKinney wrote: > > The distributions are available for download: > http://home.apache.org/~smckinney/ > > If you are to test, you may follow either one of these README’s, located in > the root folder of the core: > 1. Test with Apache

[VOTE] Release Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42

Hello, This vote is for the release of Apache Directory Fortress 1.0-RC42. Since it's been almost a year since the last release, and even then it was just the core and not the rest (pun intended:), there's a long list of fixed issues - over 50: