On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 1/3/11 12:27 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny> >wrote:
>>
>> (Renamed the thread for clarity)
>>>
>>> On 1/3/11 9:40 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Al
On 1/3/11 12:27 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote:
(Renamed the thread for clarity)
On 1/3/11 9:40 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Alex Karasulu
wrote:
Not referring to the SchemaUI bundle. In studio we have all of
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> (Renamed the thread for clarity)
>
> On 1/3/11 9:40 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Alex Karasulu
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Not referring to the SchemaUI bundle. In studio we have all of ApacheDS
>>> available in t
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Alex Karasulu
> wrote:
> > Not referring to the SchemaUI bundle. In studio we have all of ApacheDS
> > available in the embedded ApacheDS plugin bundle. This however is not
> > visible outside because it's a
(Renamed the thread for clarity)
On 1/3/11 9:40 AM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Not referring to the SchemaUI bundle. In studio we have all of ApacheDS
available in the embedded ApacheDS plugin bundle. This however is not
visible outside because
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Not referring to the SchemaUI bundle. In studio we have all of ApacheDS
> available in the embedded ApacheDS plugin bundle. This however is not
> visible outside because it's an OSGi bundle, however there's no reason why
> the DnNode class can
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> On 1/3/11 1:23 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny> >wrote:
>>
>> On 1/3/11 12:53 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny>>>
> wrote:
>
On 1/3/11 1:23 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote:
On 1/3/11 12:53 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
wrote:
On 1/2/11 4:05 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
The dn2subentry cache sounds like a valid optimiz
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 1/3/11 12:53 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny> >wrote:
>>
>> On 1/2/11 4:05 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
The dn2subentry cache sounds like a valid optimization and making
On 1/3/11 12:53 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnywrote:
On 1/2/11 4:05 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
The dn2subentry cache sounds like a valid optimization and making it a top
level accesible cache also sounds right.
I went a step further, but I sent
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 1/2/11 4:05 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> The dn2subentry cache sounds like a valid optimization and making it a top
>> level accesible cache also sounds right.
>>
> I went a step further, but I sent a mail explaining this extr
On 1/2/11 4:05 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
The dn2subentry cache sounds like a valid optimization and making it a
top level accesible cache also sounds right.
I went a step further, but I sent a mail explaining this extra step.
Additionally i checked out depa on DnNode and it seems out of pl
+1
The dn2subentry cache sounds like a valid optimization and making it a
top level accesible cache also sounds right.
Additionally i checked out depa on DnNode and it seems out of place in
shared. Had the thought that it might be best close to where it is
being used. WDYT?
Sent from m
Hi,
we currently use a UUID -> Subentry cache, used for the most common
operations like retrieving a subentry when processing an entry (as we
store the subentry's UUID in an entry selected by the subentry
SubtreeSpecification, to avoid some costly operations on disk following
a ModDN operatio
14 matches
Mail list logo