Re: Moving the OperationalAttributeInterceptor after the SchemaInterceptor in the chain

2011-11-21 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I think we can safely move the OperationalAttributeIntercepto**r after the SchemaInterceptor. This is important if we want to remove the re-entrant chain call for schema modifications, as we would then be able

Re: Moving the OperationalAttributeInterceptor after the SchemaInterceptor in the chain

2011-11-21 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
On 11/21/11 4:02 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote: On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I think we can safely move the OperationalAttributeIntercepto**r after the SchemaInterceptor. This is important if we want to remove the re-entrant chain call for schema

Moving the OperationalAttributeInterceptor after the SchemaInterceptor in the chain

2011-11-16 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
Hi, I think we can safely move the OperationalAttributeInterceptor after the SchemaInterceptor. This is important if we want to remove the re-entrant chain call for schema modifications, as we would then be able to continue the modification without having to go through all the interceptors.