Question regarding code partitioning in Shared

2010-11-10 Thread feezelr
I have been exploring the possibility of using the ApacheDS Kerberos implementation in another application in which the backing store would not be an LDAP server. There seem to be a number of areas in which the Kerberos modules are entangled with the LDAP code. One area of particular note is

Re: Question regarding code partitioning in Shared

2010-11-10 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 11/10/10 5:11 PM, feez...@gdls.com wrote: I have been exploring the possibility of using the ApacheDS Kerberos implementation in another application in which the backing store would not be an LDAP server. There seem to be a number of areas in which the Kerberos modules are entangled with the

Re: Question regarding code partitioning in Shared

2010-11-10 Thread Alex Karasulu
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote: On 11/10/10 5:11 PM, feez...@gdls.com wrote: I have been exploring the possibility of using the ApacheDS Kerberos implementation in another application in which the backing store would not be an LDAP server. There

Re: Question regarding code partitioning in Shared

2010-11-10 Thread feezelr
Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote on 11/10/2010 11:43:11 AM: On 11/10/10 5:11 PM, feez...@gdls.com wrote: I have been exploring the possibility of using the ApacheDS Kerberos implementation in another application in which the backing store would not be an LDAP server. There

Re: Question regarding code partitioning in Shared

2010-11-10 Thread Emmanuel Lecharny
On 11/10/10 7:34 PM, feez...@gdls.com wrote: LDAP asn.1 is using BER encoding, when Kerberos is using DER. Not really a big deal though, as we are encoding and decoding the PDU the same way. The difference seems to elude me more often that I grasp it. There are very few differences betwwen