On 15 févr. 2012, at 14:26, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Hi guys,
let's suppose we have an entry like :
dn: cn=john doe, ou=system
objectclass: person
cn: john doe
sn: john doe
Let's now suppose that we want to camel-case the cn to have an entry like :
dn: cn=John Doe, ou=system
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
let's suppose we have an entry like :
dn: cn=john doe, ou=system
objectclass: person
cn: john doe
sn: john doe
Let's now suppose that we want to camel-case the cn to have an entry like :
dn: cn=John
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Q1 : should we allow such a rename ? (it will modify the RDN *and* the
attribute)
So OK I see now, you just did a moddn on the entry changing the DN to use an
camel humped cn value as the last name component when it was all lower case.
Let's take the basis case to
On Feb 15, 2012, at 20:48 , Howard Chu wrote:
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Q1 : should we allow such a rename ? (it will modify the RDN *and* the
attribute)
So OK I see now, you just did a moddn on the entry changing the DN to use an
camel humped cn value as the last name component when
Le 2/15/12 8:48 PM, Howard Chu a écrit :
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Q1 : should we allow such a rename ? (it will modify the RDN
*and* the
attribute)
So OK I see now, you just did a moddn on the entry changing the DN to
use an
camel humped cn value as the last name component when it was
Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
Le 2/15/12 8:48 PM, Howard Chu a écrit :
In this case I would suggest replacing
the cn=john doe with cn=John Doe.
Q2 : if we modify the cn only, should the RDN be modified too ?
(currently, ADS does modify the CN, but not the RDN)
The op is a Mod[R]DN, so
