Just a wild thought. Really isn't the codec doing serialization too?
I know we have differing needs on the serialization format though. Just
pointing this out as a thought. The two processes do the same thing but with
different formats for different purposes.
Just a thought.
Regards,
Alex
On 3/2/11 4:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Just a wild thought. Really isn't the codec doing serialization too?
No. The codec processes Messages, not base elements as DNs, RDNs or AVAs.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
On 3/2/11 4:29 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
On 3/2/11 4:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Just a wild thought. Really isn't the codec doing serialization too?
No. The codec processes Messages, not base elements as DNs, RDNs or AVAs.
I mean, the concept is the same, except that the format is
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.orgwrote:
On 3/2/11 4:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Just a wild thought. Really isn't the codec doing serialization too?
No. The codec processes Messages, not base elements as DNs, RDNs or AVAs.
Yeah different objects but
Hi,
as I was slow those last days, I'd like to give you all a status about
the Serializers refactoring :
- Serializer helper classes have been written for Dn, Rdn, Ava,
LdifEntry, EntryAttribute, Value (both String and Binary) and Modification.
- I still have to write the Entry serializer
-
