We may create a new sub-project for JDBM

2012-02-20 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Hi guys, currently, we have a fork of JDBM that is a part of apacheds module. It takes ages to build (more than 220 seconds on my computers) because there are a lots of costly tests. I would suggest we create a new project to hold JDBM, which will be build completely separately from

Re: We may create a new sub-project for JDBM

2012-02-20 Thread Kiran Ayyagari
+1 , I already did this locally a while back On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, currently, we have a fork of JDBM that is a part of apacheds module. It takes ages to build (more than 220 seconds on my computers) because there are a lots of

Re: We may create a new sub-project for JDBM

2012-02-20 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 2/20/12 2:57 PM, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit : +1 , I already did this locally a while back Really ? Could you provide a pom.xml for that ? On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Emmanuel Lécharnyelecha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, currently, we have a fork of JDBM that is a part of apacheds

Re: We may create a new sub-project for JDBM

2012-02-20 Thread Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
Hi Emmanuel, It can make sense. Do you want to move it up one level aside 'shared', 'apacheds', 'studio', etc. ? Regards, Pierre-Arnaud On 20 févr. 2012, at 14:35, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: Hi guys, currently, we have a fork of JDBM that is a part of apacheds module. It takes ages to

Re: We may create a new sub-project for JDBM

2012-02-20 Thread Kiran Ayyagari
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote: Le 2/20/12 2:57 PM, Kiran Ayyagari a écrit : +1 , I already did this locally a while back Really ? Could you provide a pom.xml for that ? oh sorry, what I originally meant was moving out of the regular build, I