Hi guys,
I have done some profiling to see why we get a really slower processing
of operations like lookup or search with the new JDBM code base : we
always copy the value we get back from the JDBM partition, which means
we deserialize entries or dns.
Deserializing is an awfully costly
When changing jdbm, I had to do a deep copy to provide multiversioning
at jdbm level. Normally, this should not be necessary. However, at
ApacheDS, currently, there is no clear separation of IO layer and data
layer. When a writer gets an entry from JDBM or any other partition,
it modifies the
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
p...@marcelot.netwrote:
Hi Göktürk,
On 17 oct. 2011, at 17:57, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Kiran Ayyagari kayyag...@apache.orgwrote:
thanks Gokturk for the details, have another q. what will happen if
Hi guys,
A quick follow up on the work currently being done on ApacheDS around OSGI.
Göktürk is doing a really good job in moving ApacheDS code base towards OSGI.
Unfortunately, at the moment, Studio is broken (code base still compiles but it
can't be launched) due to the recent changes.
The
On 10/18/11 2:31 PM, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
Hi guys,
A quick follow up on the work currently being done on ApacheDS around OSGI.
Göktürk is doing a really good job in moving ApacheDS code base towards OSGI.
Unfortunately, at the moment, Studio is broken (code base still compiles but it
Hi,
today, I did a bit of cleanup in core-api and core-shared, moving what I
have put in core-shared to core-api (most of the moved classes were
associated with interceptors), and now, it raises a question :
- what should we do with core ?
It's almost empty, only containing a few
Hi Emmanuel,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
today, I did a bit of cleanup in core-api and core-shared, moving what I
have put in core-shared to core-api (most of the moved classes were
associated with interceptors), and now, it raises a
Hi Pierre,
Can you add apache-felix/felix-cache into svn ignore too. Thanks.
Regards,
Gokturk
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, pamarce...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pamarcelot
Date: Tue Oct 18 13:38:45 2011
New Revision: 1185648
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1185648view=rev
Log:
Sure.
It's done!
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 18 oct. 2011, at 15:54, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
Hi Pierre,
Can you add apache-felix/felix-cache into svn ignore too. Thanks.
Regards,
Gokturk
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:38 PM, pamarce...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pamarcelot
Date: Tue Oct 18
Hi Emmanuel,
Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and IPojo
will let us do everything we wanted to make ApacheDS an OSGI application.
Later changes to the code will make it dependent on OSGI Framework. So i'm
waiting for a branch as we talked. I think, if we apply
On 10/18/11 3:52 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
today, I did a bit of cleanup in core-api and core-shared, moving what I
have put in core-shared to core-api (most of the moved classes were
associated with
On 10/18/11 4:03 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and IPojo
will let us do everything we wanted to make ApacheDS an OSGI application.
I'll create a apacheds-osgi branch asap. Do we need a shared-osgi branch
too ? Or
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.orgwrote:
On 10/18/11 4:03 PM, Göktürk Gezer wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Services can be implement into ApacheDS . Good mix of OSGI itself and
IPojo
will let us do everything we wanted to make ApacheDS an OSGI application.
I'll
Emm,
Were these unused or did you just move them and a copy was left behind in
the old position?
Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:08 PM, elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Author: elecharny
Date: Tue Oct 18 13:08:31 2011
New Revision: 1185636
URL:
On 10/18/11 4:42 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
Emm,
Were these unused or did you just move them and a copy was left behind in
the old position?
They were unused.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Hi,
On 9/18/11 10:20 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to come back to our documentation issue:
- docu in confluence isn't versionized
- docbook in source control isn't easy to write
I did some research and found some interesting links [1][2][3]. I
setup an additonal user guide as
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Stefan Seelmann seelm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
Stefan started to modify the
Hi Emmanuel,
I'm doing some experiments on DS. I saw some problems on our way. Before
diving deeper i must consult you about somethings.
I'm changing the way we deal with schema
elements(LdapComparator,Normalizer,SyntaxChecker) so that they will be
pluggable. Schema manager tries to classload
Am 18.10.2011, 23:22 Uhr, schrieb Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On 9/18/11 10:20 PM, Stefan Seelmann wrote:
Hi guys,
I'd like to come back to our documentation issue:
- docu in confluence isn't versionized
- docbook in source control isn't easy to write
I did some research and
19 matches
Mail list logo
